What was the most significant difference between Hoover and FDR with regards to tackling the Great Depression? *
A- Hoover was willing to support direct relief and other forms of federal welfare; FDR was not
B- FDR was willing to use deficit spending to stimulate the economy, Hoover was not.
C-Hoover was willing to use Keynesian economic theories to combat inflation, FDR was not.
IS THIS B.
Definitely B
r u sure
I vote for B also.
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/ReferenceDetailsPage/ReferenceDetailsWindow?zid=efd93945a0cfd16f2bb6280511333b00&action=2&catId=&documentId=GALE%7CCX3404500134&userGroupName=lom_ando&jsid=b2814c4dd90c43ea922c5af1102bb0eb
Just making sure I got it right too
Yes, your answer is correct. The most significant difference between Hoover and FDR when it comes to tackling the Great Depression was in their approach to deficit spending.
Hoover, the 31st President of the United States, believed in limited government intervention and was hesitant to use deficit spending to stimulate the economy. He favored a more hands-off approach, relying on voluntary cooperation between government and businesses.
On the other hand, Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), the 32nd President of the United States, implemented the New Deal, a series of economic programs aimed at providing relief, recovery, and reform during the Great Depression. FDR was willing to use deficit spending as a means to stimulate the economy and create jobs. He believed that government intervention was necessary to combat the severe economic downturn and provide relief to those affected.
So, option B, which states that FDR was willing to use deficit spending to stimulate the economy while Hoover was not, is the correct answer.