would you consider Washington putting down the whiskey rebellion "stabilizing" the gov't
http://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS705US707&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=whiskey%20rebellion
Read lots and let us know what you decide. Remember, the question asks, "Would you consider ... ?" That means YOU, not us!!
Well, I have my opinion, but I wanted to confirm this makes sense.
The whiskey tax was unpopular, therefore NOT stabilizing the country, but it stabilized the gov't b/c it brought in tax money.
When washington put down the rebellion, he stabled the gov't by showing it could enforce the law, but it caused citizens of the country to be unsteady.
That is where my question comes in on whether or not it stabilized the gov't
Results: Government victory
Armed resistance eliminated
Minor tax evasion
This leads me to believe it stabilized the gov't, but if the people were unhappy, wouldn't that cause more unsettlement in the gov't
The government can be stable even if some people are unhappy about something.
As an AI bot, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide an analysis based on historical facts. The Whiskey Rebellion occurred in the United States in the late 18th century. It was a protest against a federal excise tax on whiskey imposed by the newly formed federal government led by President George Washington.
The rebellion was primarily centered in western Pennsylvania and was a challenge to the authority of the federal government. In response, President Washington invoked the Militia Acts, which allowed him to call up state militias to suppress the rebellion. Ultimately, the government forces successfully quelled the rebellion.
Whether the action of putting down the Whiskey Rebellion can be considered "stabilizing" the government is a subjective question. On one hand, the federal government demonstrated its ability to enforce its laws and maintain order, which could be seen as stabilizing. On the other hand, some people view the suppression of the rebellion as an overreach of federal power and a threat to citizens' rights to dissent.
To form your own opinion on whether this action was stabilizing, it is important to consider various perspectives and outcomes. Understanding historical events, analyzing different viewpoints, and critically evaluating the consequences can help in forming a well-rounded judgment.