this one is hard to me cause I do not know.... Even one of my co worers had a hard time too.. “how students learn science is just as important as what
they learn. In the teaching of science, a major objective is to develop students’ problemsolving
capabilities. To do this, teachers must structure learning experiences to provide
students with opportunities to participate in inquiry processes” (p. 269).
Reference
Lemlech, J. K. (2006). Curriculum and instructional methods for the elementary and middle
school (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
• Resource: Pages 269-275 of Curriculum and Instructional Methods
• Due Date: Day 2 [Individual] forum
• Assume the perspective of a constructivist who teaches science through inquiry.
• Write a 200- to 300-word response to the following: As a constructivist, what is your
approach to teaching? How does inquiry-based learning differ from the traditional model,
with the teacher as the source of all instruction? Provide examples of each style.
I didn't do it when it was due because I had no internet
now i need to to get some credit..... I
PLease i am stilllearning with this stuff
Dawn -- or Troyer --
First -- think how you would approach teaching as a constructivist. The inquiry-based approach plans lessons so that students can reach their own conclusions. Doing science experiments, social studies research papers, and assigning math word problems helps students learn first hand about fundamental principles.
Then, investigate the traditional model, in which the teacher tells students the facts and they dutifully write down these "pearls of wisdom."
You've been a student for over 12 years. With which method did you learn the most? Why?
Think about it.
To answer the question, let's start by understanding some key terms:
1. Constructivism: It is an educational philosophy that emphasizes active learning and the construction of knowledge through experiences. In this approach, learners actively participate in the learning process by constructing their understanding of concepts based on their prior knowledge and experiences.
2. Inquiry-based learning: It is a teaching approach that focuses on fostering students' curiosity and developing their problem-solving skills through the process of inquiry. In this approach, students actively investigate questions, gather and analyze data, and develop explanations and conclusions based on evidence.
Now, to approach this question and craft a response, you can follow these steps:
1. Read and understand the provided reference: Read the pages 269-275 of the "Curriculum and Instructional Methods" book by Lemlech. Take notes and highlight important points related to constructivism and inquiry-based learning.
2. Reflect on constructivism: Consider the approach of a constructivist teacher. Think about how you, as a teacher, would implement constructivist principles in your science classroom. Focus on promoting active learning, encouraging student inquiry, and facilitating the construction of knowledge.
3. Compare inquiry-based learning with the traditional model: Identify key differences between inquiry-based learning and the traditional model of teaching, where the teacher is the primary source of instruction. Think about the role of the teacher, student engagement, and student involvement in problem-solving within both approaches.
4. Provide examples: Support your response by providing specific examples of how you would incorporate constructivism and inquiry-based learning strategies in your science classroom. These examples could involve hands-on experiments, group investigations, or open-ended questions that encourage critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
5. Write your response: Craft a 200-300 word response, explaining your approach as a constructivist teacher and illustrating the differences between inquiry-based learning and traditional teaching. Make sure to include your examples to support your points.
Remember to proofread your response for clarity and coherence before submitting it. Good luck!