What does the author achieve by mixing exact and approximate numbers in "A Contribution to Statistics?"
I can't give you a straight forward answer, but here are some things you can expand on:
- That statistics can mean different things to others
- Statistics aren't just numbers
- Statistics aren't always accurate
i don't get the question
In "A Contribution to Statistics," the author achieves a particular effect by mixing exact and approximate numbers. By doing so, the author is able to convey a sense of precision and accuracy in describing statistical data, while also acknowledging the inherent uncertainty and limitations of statistical measurements.
When discussing data and statistics, it is often necessary to balance between providing precise values and acknowledging the limitations of the data. Exact numbers, such as specific counts or measurements, can give a sense of accuracy and credibility to the information being presented. However, it is important to recognize that data collection and measurement processes are not always perfect, and there may be inherent inaccuracies or uncertainties involved.
By mixing exact numbers with approximate numbers, the author is able to convey the complexity and nuances of statistical analysis. Approximate numbers, such as rounded figures or estimates, can help to illustrate the uncertainties and limitations in collecting or interpreting data. This approach fosters a more realistic and balanced understanding of the statistical information being presented.
Furthermore, by mixing exact and approximate numbers, the author also acknowledges that statistical data is often subject to variability and change. Statistical measurements are frequently influenced by various factors, such as sample size, data quality, or methodological differences. By incorporating approximate numbers into the discussion, the author highlights the context-dependent nature of statistical analysis and encourages readers to consider the broader implications and potential limitations of the data.
In summary, the author achieves a more nuanced and realistic portrayal of statistical information by mixing exact and approximate numbers. This approach enables the author to convey precision and accuracy while also acknowledging the uncertainties and limitations inherent in statistical measurements.
Why did she use imaginary and real numbers? What message was she sending?
Is she saying that statistics can mean anything you want them to mean?
What do you think?
http://www.poetry-chaikhana.com/Poets/S/SzymborskaWi/AContributio/index.html