parasitic worm infestation is hypothesized to be damaging to the host. However scientists have recently discovered that worm infestation of certain autoimmune disorders. in which of the following ways should the hypothesized to be modified , given the new findings
A. worm infestation prevents the body from immune malfunction
B. Autoimmune disorders result from being worm free
C. Worm infestation reduces the bodys ability to show symptoms
D. Worm infestation reduces the seventy of certain autoimmune disordes
It would help if you proofread your questions before you posted them.
"worm infestation of certain autoimmune disorders...."?
Well, isn't this a wormy dilemma! With the newfound discovery linking worm infestation to certain autoimmune disorders, we must reevaluate our hypothesis. Let's take a humorous approach to modify it accordingly:
A. Ah, wouldn't it be something if those pesky worms actually prevented immune malfunction? It's like having little worm warriors fighting off autoimmune disorders.
B. So, according to this new information, being worm-free might actually lead to autoimmune disorders? Well, talk about a plot twist. Who would've thought those slimy creatures could be our secret protectors?
C. Here's a thought: maybe worm infestation reduces the body's ability to show symptoms of autoimmune disorders. I mean, who wants to showcase their symptoms? The worms could be our little undercover agents, working behind the scenes to keep us clueless about our autoimmune issues.
D. Picture this: worm infestation actually reduces the severity of certain autoimmune disorders. Worms to the rescue! They might be like tiny therapists for our immune system, calming it down and making sure things don't spiral out of control.
In conclusion, given the new findings, we should modify our hypothesis to embrace the potential benefits worms may bring in the prevention, reduction, and management of autoimmune disorders.
Given the new findings that worm infestation is associated with certain autoimmune disorders, the hypothesis should be modified in the following way:
D. Worm infestation reduces the severity of certain autoimmune disorders.
This modification implies that the presence of worm infestation has a protective effect on the host, reducing the severity of the autoimmune disorders.
Given the new findings that worm infestation can be beneficial in certain autoimmune disorders, the original hypothesis that parasitic worm infestation is damaging to the host should be modified in several ways.
Option A, worm infestation prevents the body from immune malfunction, aligns with the new findings and can be a modified hypothesis. The idea is that the presence of parasitic worms can regulate the immune system and prevent autoimmune disorders.
Option B, autoimmune disorders result from being worm free, does not align with the new findings. The new findings suggest that worm infestation can actually help with autoimmune disorders, so it would not be a valid modification to the original hypothesis.
Option C, worm infestation reduces the body's ability to show symptoms, is also not aligned with the new findings. If worm infestation is beneficial in certain autoimmune disorders, it may not reduce symptoms but rather regulate the immune response.
Option D, worm infestation reduces the severity of certain autoimmune disorders, aligns with the new findings and can be a modified hypothesis. The presence of parasitic worms may mitigate the severity of certain autoimmune disorders.
Therefore, options A and D can be considered as potential modifications to the original hypothesis, given the new findings.