Two examples of how accountability is ensured in U.S. Bureaucratic Agencies.
What does it mean by accountability
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/accountability.html
http://www.google.com/#q=accountability+is+ensured+in+U.S.+Bureaucratic+Agencies
Accountability refers to the concept of taking responsibility for one's actions and being answerable for the outcomes of those actions. In the context of U.S. Bureaucratic Agencies, accountability is essential to ensure that public officials and agencies uphold their obligations and deliver effective services to the citizens.
Here are two examples of how accountability is ensured in U.S. Bureaucratic Agencies:
1. Political Oversight: One way accountability is maintained is through political oversight. The U.S. Congress plays a significant role in holding bureaucratic agencies accountable. Congress exercises its oversight authority by conducting hearings, demanding reports, and closely monitoring the agencies' activities. This political scrutiny ensures that agencies are acting in accordance with the law, fulfilling their mission, and utilizing resources efficiently and effectively.
To understand the specific mechanisms of political oversight, one can examine the congressional committee system. Each committee has jurisdiction over specific bureaucratic agencies and monitors their actions. For example, the Senate Committee on Finance oversees the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), ensuring its adherence to tax laws and proper financial management. The House Committee on Energy and Commerce provides oversight of agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to ensure public health and safety. By exercising their powers of investigation and conducting hearings, Congress can expose any mismanagement, corruption, or inefficiency within bureaucratic agencies, thereby enforcing accountability.
2. Performance Measures and Evaluation: Another way accountability is ensured is through the establishment of performance measures and evaluation systems. Bureaucratic agencies are required to establish goals, objectives, and performance indicators that can be measured and evaluated. This helps gauge their effectiveness and efficiency in achieving desired outcomes.
For instance, agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set goals for reducing air pollution levels, improving water quality, or advancing environmental regulations. They track relevant indicators such as air quality index, water contamination levels, and compliance with environmental standards to assess their performance. These measures are often included in annual reports, which are made publicly available, providing transparency and allowing citizens to evaluate the agency's progress. By holding agencies accountable to measurable performance targets, this approach helps identify areas that require improvement and ensures that agencies are actively working towards their stated goals.
To investigate the specific performance measures and evaluation systems in bureaucratic agencies, one can explore agency websites, annual reports, and relevant legislation that mandate accountability practices.
In summary, accountability in U.S. Bureaucratic Agencies is ensured through political oversight by the Congress and the establishment of performance measures and evaluation systems. These mechanisms help monitor agency activities, ensure compliance with laws and regulations, and promote transparency and citizens' trust in the government.