If the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand was just a trigger why did everyone wait a whole year to do anything? If war was going to happen don’t you think it was given many chances to happen before the assassination? War would have not been declared if Austria would have listened to Serbia. Therefore the assassination was not a trigger. Meaning it was the initial cause of the War. Austria did not believe that Serbia had no part in the assassination; because of this Austria declared war on Serbia with its allies Germany and the Ottoman Empire. World War One was given many chances to happen. Take for example Militarism, it were armies and weapons doubled. At any time any of these rivalries could have declared war. The assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand was no trigger it was the initial cause of World War one.
If the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand was just a trigger<~~add comma why did everyone<~~"everyone" = who? wait a whole year to do anything? If war was going to happen<~~add comma don’t you think it was given many chances to happen before the assassination? War would have not been declared if Austria would have<~~verb tense sequencing problem: delete "would have" and insert "had" listened to Serbia. Therefore<~~add comma the assassination was not a trigger. Meaning it was the initial cause of the War.<~~sentence fragment -- connect to the previous sentence by changing punctuation after "trigger" to a colon, deleting the word "Meaning" and capitalizing the "I" on "it" Austria did not believe that Serbia had no part in the assassination; because of this<~~add comma; also "this" is unclear -- "this" = what? Austria declared war on Serbia with its allies Germany and the Ottoman Empire. World War One was given<~~delete "was given" and insert "had" many chances to happen. Take<~~add comma for example<~~add comma Militarism,<~~lower case "m" and period instead of comma; capitalize first letter~~> it were<~~what?? armies and weapons doubled.<~~what??? At any time any of these rivalries could have declared war. The assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand was no trigger<~~run-on it was the initial cause of World War one<~~capitalize "O" to be consistent.
Also ...
"Austria declared war on Serbia with its allies Germany and the Ottoman Empire."
Germany and the Ottoman Empire were allies of whom? Austria or Serbia? The connection is not clear in your sentence.
Thank you Writeacher
YW!!
Also ...
At any time any of these rivalries could have declared war.
Add a comma after "time."
=)
writeteacher is smart
The question raised here is why everyone waited a whole year to take action after the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand if war was already going to happen. The argument is that if war was inevitable, then there must have been many chances for it to occur before the assassination. The statement implies that the assassination was not just a trigger, but the initial cause of World War One.
To answer this question, we need to consider the historical context. The assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand took place on June 28, 1914, in Sarajevo, Bosnia. It was the spark that set off a series of events leading to the outbreak of World War One. However, the immediate response to the assassination was not war. Instead, there was a complex web of alliances, rivalries, and diplomacy that played out over the next year.
Austria-Hungary, the country to which Archduke Francis Ferdinand belonged, blamed Serbia for the assassination and issued an ultimatum to Serbia, demanding certain concessions. Serbia, however, did not fully meet Austria-Hungary's demands. This led Austria-Hungary to declare war on Serbia on July 28, 1914. Germany, as Austria-Hungary's ally, supported this declaration of war.
So why did it take a whole year for war to break out? One reason is that there were attempts at diplomacy and negotiations to prevent the escalation of the conflict. The major powers in Europe, including Britain, France, and Russia, were involved in diplomatic efforts to find a peaceful resolution. These efforts were unsuccessful, and the crisis escalated into war on a larger scale.
Furthermore, it is important to note that there were underlying causes and tensions that existed prior to the assassination. These included militarism, imperialism, and nationalism, which were already placing strain on international relationships. The assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand can be seen as the spark that ignited these pre-existing tensions and led to the outbreak of war.
In conclusion, while the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand was indeed a trigger for the events that unfolded, it was not the only factor. The complex web of alliances and the underlying tensions in Europe played a significant role in the outbreak of World War One. The assassination served as a catalyst, but it was the culmination of a series of factors that eventually led to war.