Why literature thinks of science in a negative or destructive way?
Can someone elaborate on this a bit? I'm not quite understanding it.
There is one quote but i forgot who said this:
"no science can replace a myth, and no myth can ever replace science."
Basically I think what it means is that literature and science are complete opposites.
Hope that helps.
I don't know if I or Jules Verne would agree with the proposition. Nor would I think that Isaac Asimov would agree.
The perception of literature thinking of science in a negative or destructive way is not a universal belief, nor is it true for all literary works. However, there are instances where literature portrays science in a negative light. This portrayal often stems from certain themes, perspectives, or critiques that the authors choose to explore.
There are a few possible reasons for this portrayal. One could be the fear of the unknown. Science often explores new and unfamiliar territories, and this can be seen as threatening or disruptive to established beliefs and traditions. Literature may sometimes reflect this fear through characters or plotlines that challenge or question the consequences of scientific progress.
Another reason could be the tension between reason and emotion. Literature often delves into the complexities of human experiences and emotions, while science tends to prioritize rationality and objectivity. This dichotomy can lead to literary works that highlight the potential pitfalls or moral dilemmas associated with the pursuit of scientific knowledge.
Furthermore, literature has a long history of critiquing power structures and institutions. Science and technology have been integral in the development and maintenance of these structures. Through literature, authors may explore the ethical implications and consequences of unchecked scientific progress, portraying it as a force that can be manipulated or misused by those in power.
It is important to note that not all literature presents science negatively. Many works celebrate the wonders of scientific advancements, acknowledge the potential for positive change, or delve into the philosophical and moral questions that arise from scientific discoveries. The portrayal of science in literature can be diverse and complex, reflecting the varied perspectives and values of different authors and societies.
Understanding literature's perspective on science requires engaging with the texts themselves. It involves examining the themes, characters, and narrative choices made by authors. By carefully reading and analyzing literary works, you can gain insights into why science may be portrayed in certain ways and how these portrayals contribute to the overall message or meaning of the text.