1Which of the following would john locke most favor
Republic
Oligarchy
Theocracy
Absolute monarchy
2Whay was james i resistant to working with parliament
He believed in the absolute power of kings
He did not agree with the policies of the prime minister
3Which statement gives the best summaryof the english bill of rights
The act gave the individual and parliament increased rights and power
The bill established a shared authority to levy taxes
The bill gave the monarch authority between parliment and the manarch
The act established shared authority
We'll be glad to check your answers.
A c b
1. John Locke would most favor a Republic because he believed in the power of the people and government by consent.
2. James I was resistant to working with parliament because he believed in the absolute power of kings and did not want to share his authority.
3. The best summary of the English Bill of Rights is that it gave the individual and Parliament increased rights and power, establishing a shared authority between the monarch and Parliament.
1. To determine which option John Locke would most favor, it is important to understand his political beliefs. John Locke was a philosopher who advocated for the concept of natural rights and limited government. He believed in a social contract between the government and the governed, where the government's power is derived from the consent of the people.
Looking at the given options, John Locke would most likely favor a Republic. A Republic is a form of government where power is held by elected representatives who are responsible to the citizens. In a Republic, there is a separation of powers and limitations on the government's authority. This aligns with Locke's belief in limited government and the protection of individual rights.
2. To understand why James I was resistant to working with Parliament, it is important to consider the historical context of the time. James I was the first Stuart monarch of England, and he believed in the divine right of kings. This concept asserted that kings were appointed by God and therefore had absolute power and authority over their subjects.
James I viewed Parliament as a potential threat to his authority. He believed that the king's power should not be limited or shared with any other institution, including Parliament. Therefore, James I resisted working with Parliament because he believed in the absolute power of kings and saw them as a potential obstacle to his authority.
3. The best summary of the English Bill of Rights is that it gave the individual and Parliament increased rights and power. The English Bill of Rights was passed in 1689 and was a crucial document in establishing the rights and liberties of English subjects. It was a response to the abuses of power by previous monarchs, such as James II.
The English Bill of Rights specifically aimed to limit the powers of the monarchy and protect the rights and freedoms of individuals. It ensured that the monarch could not suspend laws, raise taxes, or maintain a standing army without the consent of Parliament. It also guaranteed freedom of speech, fair and speedy trials, and protection against cruel and unusual punishment.
In summary, the English Bill of Rights increased the power and authority of both the individual and Parliament, establishing a system of shared authority between the two.