1)Which best expresses how Missouri's application for statehood threatened the future of slaves?
A)It could have given more power to the states in favor of slavery.
B)People in the Missouri Territory had no mercy for runaway slaves.
C)The governor of the territory believed that slaves should never be free.
D)The plantation owners in the Missouri Territory wanted to outlaw hiring freed slaves.
2)Which was built more in the 1800s–railroads or canals–and why?
A)canals–goods could reach ports in less time at a reduced cost
B)railroads–more cities could access railroads and increase trade
C)canals–steamboats were less dangerous than steam locomotives
D)railroads–railroad workers were more readily available than canal workers
Answers:
1) C or A?
2) B
I agree with your answer to #2. #1 can't be both A and C. What was the Missouri Compromise? Read your text materials.
http://www.history.com/topics/missouri-compromise
To get the answer to question 1, you need to analyze the options and determine which one best expresses how Missouri's application for statehood threatened the future of slaves.
Option A states that the application could have given more power to the states in favor of slavery. This suggests that if Missouri was admitted as a state, it could have led to the expansion of slavery into other states, increasing its influence and power.
Option B talks about the attitude of people in the Missouri Territory toward runaway slaves. While this may indicate a threat to individual slaves, it does not specifically address how Missouri's statehood application posed a threat to the future of slaves on a wider scale.
Option C suggests that the governor of the Missouri Territory believed that slaves should never be free. This viewpoint would likely contribute to the perpetuation of slavery if Missouri became a state.
Option D mentions the desire of plantation owners in the Missouri Territory to outlaw hiring freed slaves. While this shows a specific intent to restrict the rights and opportunities of freed slaves, it does not directly address the impact of Missouri's statehood application on slaves as a whole.
Considering these options, the best answer would be A) It could have given more power to the states in favor of slavery. This option implies that Missouri's statehood application threatened the future of slaves by potentially empowering other states to adopt pro-slavery policies.
Now, let's move on to question 2. To determine which was built more in the 1800s - railroads or canals - and why, we need to evaluate the options.
Option A states that canals were built more because they allowed goods to reach ports in less time and at a reduced cost. This option suggests the advantages of canals in terms of transportation efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Option B argues that railroads were built more because they provided increased accessibility to railroads for more cities and facilitated trade. This option suggests the benefits of railroads in expanding trade opportunities and connecting various locations.
Option C suggests that canals were built more due to the perception that steamboats were less dangerous than steam locomotives. Although steam locomotives may have been considered more dangerous, this option does not directly address the issue of which was built more in the 1800s.
Option D proposes that railroads were built more because railroad workers were more readily available than canal workers. This option focuses on the availability of laborers, which may have influenced the choice of construction projects, but it does not directly address which type of infrastructure was prioritized.
Considering these options, the best answer would be B) railroads were built more because more cities could access railroads and increase trade. This option indicates that the expansion of railroads in the 1800s allowed for greater connectivity and trade opportunities between cities, making railroads a more prominent infrastructure development compared to canals.
1) The answer to question 1 is A) It could have given more power to the states in favor of slavery. Missouri's application for statehood threatened the future of slaves because it would have potentially tipped the balance of power in favor of slavery in the United States. This would have given more power to the states that supported slavery and potentially made it more difficult to pass anti-slavery legislation or policies at the national level.
2) The answer to question 2 is B) railroads. In the 1800s, railroads were built more than canals because they provided greater accessibility to more cities, which in turn increased trade. Railways were able to transport goods faster and more efficiently over longer distances compared to canals, allowing for the expansion of trade and commerce between cities. Additionally, the availability of railroad workers and the advent of steam locomotives further contributed to the preference for railroads over canals during this period.