how does the author of selection 1 express his or her point of view differently than the author of selection two?

author of selection one agrees with abandoning federal protection of grizzly bears

author of selection one believes that the increase in grizzly bear population is a threat to human ••

author of selection one believe that people should save the grizzly bears natural habitat

author of selection one thinks development and energy corporations should be banned in order to save the grizzly population

Correct me

1: There's good news and bad news about grizzly bears in the American West. The good news? Their numbers have been increasing in recent years. In 1975, grizzlies made the threatened-species list under the federal Endangered Species Act. The bad news? Some politicians want to abandon federal protection for the bears. Powerful energy corporations want to invade bear habitats to look for oil and gas. Developers want to build houses and shopping malls in bear territory. The bears are also losing their natural food source. Disease is killing the Whitebark Pines that grizzlies eat. If you care about these great bears, please help us save them.

2: Grizzly bears are no pushovers. The food sources and habitats for the grizzly bears are drastically vanishing, which is causing a problem for not just the bears. From Wyoming to Washington, the overcrowding of grizzly bears us causing the species to move closer to more abundant food sources and into human habitats. Because of the increased risk to humans and the bear species, bears should be caught and placed in captivity until the bear population reaches a safer number.

Sorry, my long-distance vision is out of order today. I can't see what "selection 1" is from here.

Selecting 1: There's good news and bad news about grizzly bears in the American West. The good news? Their numbers have been increasing in recent years. In 1975, grizzlies made the threatened-species list under the federal Endangered Species Act. The bad news? Some politicians want to abandon federal protection for the bears. Powerful energy corporations want to invade bear habitats to look for oil and gas. Developers want to build houses and shopping malls in bear territory. The bears are also losing their natural food source. Disease is killing the Whitebark Pines that grizzlies eat. If you care about these great bears, please help us save them.

Ah. When I first saw your post, you had not posted the selection. Your answer is not correct.

don't say sorry that person is just being rude for no reason

b a d.

Does anyone know the all answers?

Based on the information provided, it seems like there might be some confusion in your question. You mentioned "author of selection one" multiple times, suggesting that there might be more than one author expressing different points of view. However, only the viewpoint of one author is mentioned in your statement.

If you could provide additional information or clarify your question, I would be more than happy to help you understand how different authors express their points of view.

How about the third one?? And sorry about that