John C. Calhoun proposed that neither Congress nor local governments had the authority to ban slavery from a territory but why i need to know plz help...
Calhoun saw slavery as a "positive good."
http://www.google.com/#q=calhoun+slavery
Thank you so much..
You're very welcome.
Understanding why John C. Calhoun proposed that neither Congress nor local governments had the authority to ban slavery from a territory requires some historical context. John C. Calhoun was a leading proponent of slavery and states' rights during the pre-Civil War era in the United States.
To understand his position, it is helpful to know about the time period in which he lived. In the early 19th century, tensions between the North and South regarding the expansion of slavery were escalating. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 had banned slavery in the western territories, but the question of whether slavery would be permitted in new territories acquired by the United States became a growing point of contention.
Calhoun, along with other pro-slavery advocates, believed that slavery was a constitutional right and that Congress did not have the power to ban it in any territory. They argued that to deny the expansion of slavery would be a violation of the property rights of slaveholders.
Calhoun's belief was rooted in the concept of states' rights, which emphasized that individual states should have the power to make their own decisions regarding slavery. He contended that neither Congress nor local governments should be able to interfere with an individual state's decision to allow or prohibit slavery.
To delve deeper into this historical context and John C. Calhoun's viewpoints, you can consult primary sources like his speeches and writings, as well as secondary sources such as books or articles on the subject. Understanding the context will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the motivations and arguments behind Calhoun's proposal.