Instead of using investments as a tool of U.S. foreign policy, Wilson’s “moral diplomacy” hoped to promote U.S. interests by
A. supporting the social and national well-being of Latin American nations.
B. establishing religious leaders in positions of power in Latin America.
C. protecting Latin American nations from military intervention by France.
D. stationing U.S. forces throughout Latin America.
A?
Right.
A. supporting the social and national well-being of Latin American nations.
To determine the answer, let's break down the options and analyze them:
A. Supporting the social and national well-being of Latin American nations: This option aligns with Wilson's "moral diplomacy" because it suggests that the U.S. would promote its interests by helping to improve the social and national welfare of Latin American countries.
B. Establishing religious leaders in positions of power in Latin America: There is no evidence to suggest that Wilson's "moral diplomacy" involved establishing religious leaders in Latin American countries.
C. Protecting Latin American nations from military intervention by France: While Wilson was concerned about foreign military intervention in Latin America, particularly by European powers, his focus was not specifically on France. This option does not encompass the overall aim of Wilson's "moral diplomacy."
D. Stationing U.S. forces throughout Latin America: Wilson's approach was not about stationing U.S. forces in Latin America as a means of promoting U.S. interests. Instead, it sought to use diplomacy and negotiations to achieve U.S. objectives.
Based on this analysis, option A, supporting the social and national well-being of Latin American nations, aligns most closely with Wilson's "moral diplomacy." Therefore, the correct answer is A.