Which statement from "Zoos: Joys or Jails?" best captures the author's point of view?

"At the zoo they are treated with care, but they should be treated with reverence."
"Animals behave differently than they would in their natural surroundings."
"Animals like big cats are accustomed to roaming territories of up to 10 square miles."
"Some advocates say that zoos protect and save endangered species.

My answer is A.

I haven't read this; perhaps none of the tutors here have read it. Ask yourself what the author's conclusion is. Is he or she in favor of zoos or not? Does the author think zoos are great, or should be improved, or that animals should be left in their natural habitats? Then make your choice as to which of these quotations most closely supports that conclusion.

Thanks, I guess I should of thought of that, but I was correct :)

To determine which statement from "Zoos: Joys or Jails?" best captures the author's point of view, you need to carefully read the article and analyze the author's perspective. Here's how you can do it:

1. Locate the article: Find the source of "Zoos: Joys or Jails?" where it was published, whether it's a book, article, or online source.

2. Read the entire article: Start by reading the entire article to grasp the main arguments and points discussed. Take note of any statements that convey the author's opinion on zoos.

3. Identify the author's point of view: Look for statements that reflect the author's overall perspective on zoos. Keep an eye out for words or phrases that express their stance clearly, such as supportive or critical language.

4. Evaluate each statement: Analyze each statement presented as options and compare them to the tone and arguments presented throughout the article. Look for statements that align with the author's perspective.

Based on the given options, it can be inferred that the statement "Some advocates say that zoos protect and save endangered species" is likely the one that best captures the author's point of view. However, it's important to note that without the full context of the article and considering other statements made, it is always best to examine the entire piece to form a comprehensive understanding of the author's viewpoint.