What is not an example of Reapportionment?

A. Rust Belt states losing representatives
B. Sunbelt states gaining representatives
C. Redistricting with equal representation
D. Gerrymandering without equal representation
E. Majority-Minority district with equal representation

D?

d is correct

To determine the correct answer, let's first understand what reapportionment means. Reapportionment is the process of redistributing representation in a legislative body, typically based on population changes. It occurs every ten years after the U.S. Census is conducted.

Now, let's evaluate each option:

A. Rust Belt states losing representatives: This is a valid example of reapportionment. If a region experiences a decrease in population relative to other states, it may result in a loss of congressional representatives during reapportionment.

B. Sunbelt states gaining representatives: This is also a valid example of reapportionment. If a region experiences significant population growth, it may gain additional congressional representatives during reapportionment.

C. Redistricting with equal representation: This option is not an example of reapportionment. Redistricting is the process of drawing or redrawing district boundaries within a state to ensure equal representation. While redistricting may occur simultaneously with reapportionment, it is a separate process that aims to maintain equal representation, not redistribute it.

D. Gerrymandering without equal representation: This option is a valid example of improper and unfair manipulation of district boundaries with the intention of achieving a political advantage. Gerrymandering, however, is not related to reapportionment.

E. Majority-Minority district with equal representation: This option is also not an example of reapportionment. A majority-minority district is a district wherein the majority of the population belongs to a particular racial or ethnic minority. While reapportionment could impact the number of representatives in such a district, the characteristic of being a majority-minority district does not directly relate to reapportionment itself.

Based on the explanations above, the correct answer is indeed option D. Gerrymandering without equal representation.