Please check!

1. What was the effect of the rise of unions in the late 1800s?
a. The population in cities quickly grew.***
b. South Carolina developed many unions prior to World War I.
c. Workers had more bargaining power with management.
d. Living conditions in cities improved significantly.

Is it c. Workers had more bargaining power with management Ms. Sue?

Can you please give me a website to read so I can figure this out?

To find the answer to this question, we can analyze the options given and determine which one aligns with the effect of the rise of unions in the late 1800s.

Option a states that the population in cities quickly grew. While the rise of unions could have contributed to increased urbanization and migration to cities, it is not the direct effect of unions.

Option b suggests that South Carolina developed many unions prior to World War I. However, there is no evidence or historical consensus to support this claim.

Option c states that workers had more bargaining power with management. This aligns with one of the major effects of the rise of unions in the late 1800s. As unions became more prominent and organized, they provided workers with collective bargaining power to negotiate better wages, working conditions, and benefits.

Option d claims that living conditions in cities improved significantly. While the rise of unions may have indirectly contributed to improved working conditions and workers' rights, it does not necessarily mean that living conditions in cities improved significantly as a direct result of unions.

Based on this analysis, the correct answer is c. Workers had more bargaining power with management.

I disagree.

Yes, that's the purpose of unions -- to present a united group effort for the workers.