theses are the 8 steps...
1. Be alert to indications and symptoms of problems.
2. Tentatively define the problem.
3. Collect facts and redefine the problem if necessary.
4. Identify possible alternatives.
5. Gather and organize facts concerning identified alternatives.
6. Evaluate possible alternatives.
7. Choose and implement the best alternative.
8. Follow up
Which of the 8 step of decision-making model could be elimated if a decision had to be made quickly.Is the model more appropriate for individual or groupdecision-making? Explain.
The most time-consuming step is # 5, making it probably the most practical step to eliminate for a quick decision.
I believe the model is more appropriate for group decision-making.
What do you think?
yeah, that is true
If a decision had to be made quickly, Step 3 ("Collect facts and redefine the problem if necessary") could potentially be eliminated or shortened. In urgent situations, there may not be enough time to extensively collect facts or reassess the problem. However, it is still important to have a basic understanding of the problem before proceeding with a quick decision.
The decision-making model described in the 8 steps can be used for both individual and group decision-making, but it can be more appropriate for group decision-making. In a group setting, multiple perspectives can be taken into account, and the process of gathering and evaluating facts can benefit from the input and discussion of different individuals. Group decision-making may lead to a more comprehensive analysis and a broader range of alternatives being considered. However, individual decision-making can also benefit from following these steps, particularly in situations where outside input or collaboration is not readily available.