How did congress react when it discovered Black codes in the south
A) it enacted stricter reconstruction plans.
B) it created public schooling
C) it increased the number of share cropped in the south.
D) it called for the impeached of Andrew Jackson. ***
How did sharecropping effect the lives of freedmen
A) it provided job security ,encouraging Freedmen to stay in the south.***
B) hi Deb Freedmen from becoming financially secure
C) it prevented them from being able to vote in elections
D) Freedmen didn't have enough land to feed their own family
1. is D Representation was based on population alone.
2. is c The Republicans increased taxes and spending in order to rebuild after the civil war
3. is A It enacted stricter reconstruction plans
4. is B High debt kept freedmen from becoming financially secure
5. is C The freedmen's Burea if you go to scca\connections acadamy
this is 100% correct i swear on my life and to god.
1, D, no
2. A. yes
Check your text for 2. It may have a different answer.
Just trying to help is 100% correct
just rying to help is correct 100%
what is it ?
for the first one
To answer the question about how Congress reacted when it discovered Black Codes in the South, we need to know the historical context. The Black Codes were laws enacted in the Southern states right after the Civil War to restrict the freedoms and rights of African Americans.
When Congress learned about the Black Codes, it responded by enacting stricter reconstruction plans. Reconstruction was the process of rebuilding the Southern states and integrating freed slaves into society after the Civil War. Congress aimed to protect the rights of African Americans and ensure their full citizenship and participation in society. Thus, option A, "it enacted stricter reconstruction plans," is the correct answer.
Moving on to the question about how sharecropping affected the lives of Freedmen, it is important to understand what sharecropping was. Sharecropping emerged as an economic system in the South after the abolition of slavery, where freedmen and poor white farmers rented land from large landowners in exchange for a portion of their crop.
Regarding its impact on freedmen, option A, "it provided job security, encouraging Freedmen to stay in the south," is correct. Sharecropping did indeed provide job security since freedmen were able to work the land and earn a living through sharecropping arrangements. This led many freedmen to stay in the South and rely on this system for their livelihoods.
Option B, "it discouraged freedmen from becoming financially secure," is also partially correct. Sharecropping often subjected freedmen to harsh economic conditions, including high debts and dependency on the landowner. This made it challenging for freedmen to accumulate wealth and achieve financial security.
Option C, "it prevented them from being able to vote in elections," is not directly related to sharecropping but can be considered a consequence of other discriminatory laws and practices in the South during that time. The disenfranchisement of African Americans was achieved through measures such as poll taxes, literacy tests, and intimidation tactics.
Option D, "Freedmen didn't have enough land to feed their own family," is also correct. Since sharecroppers only worked a portion of the land and had to give a significant part of their crop to the landowner as payment, many freedmen did not have enough land to fully support their families or produce surplus for their own consumption.
In summary, option A is the correct choice for how Congress reacted to the discovery of Black Codes, and option A is correct for how sharecropping affected freedmen's lives.