Would it be possible to have a socialist direct democracy?

No, in a socialist society only a few high-ranking members of the communist party have political power.
No, a direct democracy requires a free market economy which is not socialist.
Yes, if everyone voted on economic decisions rather than letting markets decide them, then it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.***
Yes, if the society was ruled by a king who made the majority of economic decisions, it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.

Correct!

The correct answer is: Yes, if everyone voted on economic decisions rather than letting markets decide them, then it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.

To arrive at this answer, we need to understand the basic principles of socialism and direct democracy, as well as their compatibility.

Socialism is an economic and political theory advocating for public or collective ownership and control of the means of production. This means that in a socialist society, the government or the community as a whole would have control over industries, resources, and economic decision-making.

Direct democracy, on the other hand, is a system of government in which citizens have the power to participate directly in decision-making processes. This can be done through voting on laws, policies, and other matters of public concern.

To have a socialist direct democracy, economic decisions would be made through direct participation and voting by the citizens, rather than relying on market forces. This would entail the community collectively deciding on issues such as resource allocation, production planning, and distribution of goods and services.

It is important to note that socialist direct democracy does not necessarily require a free market economy. In fact, socialism typically involves a planned or regulated economy, in which the government or the community actively manages and coordinates economic activities.

Therefore, the answer "Yes, if everyone voted on economic decisions rather than letting markets decide them, then it could be considered a socialist direct democracy" is the most accurate response to the question.