15. The growth of direct primaries has resulted in which of the following major change to political parties?


Political parties, instead of the Senate, host and determine the rules for direct primaries.
National conventions held by major parties, instead of congressional caucuses, nominate candidates for primaries
Citizens can no longer run for an elective office without the approval and support of an organized political party.
Private fund-raising by primary candidates has given way to public financing of political parties.
Political parties have less influence over the elected, because the parties cannot control who is nominated.

Last question in a extra credit set that I don't quite understand.

15. The growth of direct primaries has resulted in which of the following major change to political parties?


Political parties, instead of the Senate, host and determine the rules for direct primaries.

National conventions held by major parties, instead of congressional caucuses, nominate candidates for primaries

Citizens can no longer run for an elective office without the approval and support of an organized political party.

Private fund-raising by primary candidates has given way to public financing of political parties.

Political parties have less influence over the elected, because the parties cannot control who is nominated.

Oops sorry about the original formatting

Direct primaries are elections held in individual states for voters to choose their party's candidate for president. If you follow the news, you know that New Hampshire just had a primary election in which the voters chose the Republican, Donald Trump, and the Democrat, Bernie Sanders.

What do you think is the best answer?

To determine the answer to this question, we need to understand the concept of direct primaries and their impact on political parties.

Direct primaries refer to a system in which voters directly choose a political party's nominees to run in general elections. This is in contrast to the previous practice of party leaders or delegates selecting candidates through processes like caucuses or conventions.

Now, let's examine each option and see which one corresponds to the major change brought about by the growth of direct primaries:

1. Political parties, instead of the Senate, host and determine the rules for direct primaries.
This option is not directly related to the impact of direct primaries on political parties. The Senate's involvement in determining the rules for direct primaries is not mentioned in the question or the explanation of direct primaries.

2. National conventions held by major parties, instead of congressional caucuses, nominate candidates for primaries.
This option indicates a shift in the nomination process from congressional caucuses to national conventions. However, it does not specifically address the impact of direct primaries on political parties.

3. Citizens can no longer run for an elective office without the approval and support of an organized political party.
This option suggests a major change where citizens are required to have the approval and support of a political party to run for office. However, it does not directly relate to the growth of direct primaries.

4. Private fund-raising by primary candidates has given way to public financing of political parties.
This option refers to a change in campaign financing where public financing replaces private fundraising by primary candidates. However, it does not specifically pertain to the impact of direct primaries on political parties.

5. Political parties have less influence over the elected because the parties cannot control who is nominated.
This option directly addresses the impact of direct primaries on political parties. With direct primaries, the power to nominate candidates shifts from party leaders or delegates to the voters. Consequently, political parties have less control over who is nominated, resulting in reduced influence over the elected officials.

Therefore, the correct answer to the question is:
Political parties have less influence over the elected because the parties cannot control who is nominated.