Hypotheses can be rejected or supported by experiments, or, in some instances, new observations.
i think it's true
I agree.
You are correct.
Thanks!
Yes, your understanding is correct. Hypotheses can be either rejected or supported through experiments or new observations. Let me explain how this process works:
When scientists develop a hypothesis, they are essentially making an educated guess or a prediction about the relationship between certain variables. To test whether the hypothesis is valid or not, they conduct experiments or make new observations.
During an experiment, scientists manipulate certain variables to see how they impact the outcome. The results obtained from the experiment can either support or contradict the initial hypothesis. If the experimental results align with the predicted outcome described in the hypothesis, the hypothesis is supported. However, if the experimental results do not align with the predicted outcome, the hypothesis is rejected.
Similarly, in cases where experiments are not feasible or practical, new observations can be made to either support or reject a hypothesis. Scientists gather data from real-life situations, analyze it, and check if it corroborates or contradicts the proposed hypothesis.
It is important to note that while experiments and observations can support a hypothesis, they cannot definitively prove it true. However, multiple consistent results from various experiments or observations can increase confidence in the hypothesis. Conversely, a single contradictory result can significantly weaken or disprove the hypothesis.
In summary, hypotheses are evaluated through experiments or new observations. If the results align with the hypothesis, it is supported, whereas if the results contradict the hypothesis, it is rejected.