what generalization can you make about the abolition of slavery in the north?
Mr. Pursley is right. The question presents a biased point of view. Abolitionists varied all over the political and moral map, from the John Browns to preachers with moral messages to hypocrites, as Mr. Pursley points out, who were all into wage-slaves as long as the myth of free will was maintained. Northerners were all for freeing the slaves, but did not want to live near free blacks, and were often quite willing to enforce the fugitive slave laws all at once. It's very hard to make generalizations.
Food is good.
What Generalizations can you make about the abolition of slavery in the North?
The generalization that can be made about the abolition of slavery in the North is that it occurred earlier compared to the South.
To understand this, one can look at the historical timeline of the abolition movement in the United States. In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, various factors such as the American Revolution, religious beliefs, moral arguments, and economic shifts contributed to the growing opposition against slavery.
In the North, where industrialization was gaining momentum and agriculture was less reliant on slave labor, the abolitionist movement gained traction more rapidly. Several Northern states began passing laws gradually abolishing slavery, starting with Vermont in 1777, Pennsylvania in 1780, and Massachusetts in 1783.
By the early 1800s, most Northern states had implemented gradual emancipation laws or outright abolished slavery. For example, New York had enacted gradual emancipation laws in 1799, and the process was completed by 1827.
One significant event that further accelerated the abolitionist cause was the creation of the American Anti-Slavery Society in 1833. This organization advocated for immediate and complete emancipation and played a crucial role in galvanizing public opinion against slavery.
On the other hand, in the Southern states, where the economy was primarily dependent on plantation agriculture, and slave labor was deeply ingrained, the resistance to abolition was more pronounced. Slavery continued to be legally protected and defended by Southern political and social institutions.
The stark contrast in the economic systems and societal attitudes towards slavery contributed to the longer-standing institution of slavery in the South, with it being upheld until the enactment of the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1865.
Therefore, the generalization that emerges is that the abolition of slavery occurred earlier in the Northern states due to a combination of economic, social, and ideological factors, while the Southern states held onto the institution for a longer period.
generalization? Lord, thousands could be made.
1) Yankees were two faced on the issue, they renamed slavery to labor markets, especially in New England. Working poor in New England suffered greatly under labor laws that oppressed them.
2) Abolition varied in meaning where in the "North" one lived. Was Kentucky "North"?
3) Abolition and the 3/5 rule they held sacrosanct hardly can be reconciled.
Want others? You need to answer this in the view of the bias your text presented, not mine. What? your text is biased? You bet. Give them the answer they present, but in the end, do your own analysis and thinking.