What distinguishes the U.S. Supreme Court from a state supreme court'?

State supreme courts have rulings that can be overturned, while U.S. Supreme Court rulings are
final.
State supreme courts have limited jurisdiction on the types of cases they can rule on, while the
jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court is unlimited.
State supreme courts cannot rule on cases involving personal rights, while the U.S. Supreme
Court can.
The U .S. Supreme Court must hear all appeals cases, while state supreme courts chose the cases
they hear.

My 2nd answer is A

thanks

The U.S. Supreme Court and state supreme courts have some key differences that distinguish them from each other.

Firstly, one distinction between the U.S. Supreme Court and state supreme courts is that U.S. Supreme Court rulings are final and cannot be overturned by any other court. Once the Supreme Court has made a decision on a case, it becomes the law of the land and serves as a binding precedent for future cases. On the other hand, state supreme court rulings can be appealed to higher state courts or even to the U.S. Supreme Court itself, depending on the specific circumstances and legal issues involved.

Secondly, state supreme courts have limited jurisdiction, meaning they can only rule on certain types of cases as defined by state law. Their jurisdiction is limited to the laws and constitution of the state in which they operate. In contrast, the U.S. Supreme Court has unlimited jurisdiction. It can hear cases involving federal law, constitutional issues, and disputes between states, among others. The U.S. Supreme Court's jurisdiction extends to the entire country, and its decisions can have nationwide effects.

Another distinction is that state supreme courts generally cannot rule on cases involving personal rights that are protected by the U.S. Constitution. These rights are typically within the purview of the U.S. Supreme Court. State supreme courts primarily handle cases that concern state laws and state constitutions. However, if a state court decision raises a federal constitutional issue, it can be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Lastly, whereas the U.S. Supreme Court must hear all appeals cases that come before it, state supreme courts have discretion in choosing which cases they will hear. State supreme courts typically have a range of cases to choose from and can prioritize those that raise important legal questions or have significant impact within their jurisdiction. They may decline to hear certain cases if they believe the issues have already been adequately addressed or if they lack jurisdiction.

In summary, the U.S. Supreme Court differs from state supreme courts in that its rulings are final, its jurisdiction is unlimited, it can rule on cases involving personal rights, and it is required to hear all appeals cases. State supreme courts have more limited jurisdiction, their rulings can be appealed to higher courts, they have restrictions on ruling on cases involving personal rights, and they have discretion in choosing which cases to hear.

And your answer is?

No.

A is the best answer.