Scientists earlier believed that the lowest measurable temperature is the freezing point of ice. However, modern scientists believe that temperatures below the freezing point of ice can also exist. What best accounts for these different opinions?
scientists propose contradictory ideas to include all possibilities
scientists come up with different hypotheses without enough evidence
scientists propose different ideas to avoid repetition of scientific knowledge
scientists having different interests may interpret the same data in different ways
IM having trouble with this pls help
When faced with a question like this, it's crucial to analyze the given options to identify the one that best explains the differing opinions of scientists on the lowest measurable temperature. Let's go through each option one by one:
1. Scientists propose contradictory ideas to include all possibilities: This option suggests that scientists present contradictory ideas to encompass all potential outcomes. While this may be the case in some situations, it does not specifically account for the differing opinions regarding the lowest measurable temperature.
2. Scientists come up with different hypotheses without enough evidence: This option implies that scientists develop different hypotheses without sufficient evidence to support their claims. While this may happen occasionally, it does not directly explain the varying beliefs about the lowest measurable temperature.
3. Scientists propose different ideas to avoid repetition of scientific knowledge: This option suggests that scientists propose different ideas to prevent the repetition of established scientific knowledge. Although this may occur in certain contexts, it doesn't directly address the differing opinions on the lowest measurable temperature.
4. Scientists having different interests may interpret the same data in different ways: This option states that scientists with varying interests might interpret the same data differently. This is the most logical choice, as scientists from different fields of study or with different research focuses may interpret data in distinct ways based on their specific interests and perspectives. Therefore, this option best accounts for the differing opinions on the lowest measurable temperature.
To summarize, the option "Scientists having different interests may interpret the same data in different ways" best explains why scientists hold different opinions regarding the lowest measurable temperature. They may interpret the available data differently based on their individual research interests.
Are you in a religious school? None of these choices reflect the scientific method, and .... in the base text, it presents alternative hypothesis as "opinions". Science is not "opinions"
You need a proper schooling quickly.