I am confused about this question. Is it true or False?
The Era of good feelings was a period of sustained economic prosperity, even though two political parties were bitterly divided.
I think its false....
You're right. The statement is false. The political parties were not bitterly divided.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Era_of_Good_Feelings
To determine whether the statement is true or false, we need to break it down and analyze each component:
1. "The Era of Good Feelings": The Era of Good Feelings refers to a period of time in the United States, specifically from 1817 to 1825, during James Monroe's presidency. This term is often associated with a sense of national unity and a lack of partisan conflict.
2. "Sustained economic prosperity": This implies that the economy experienced consistent growth and success during the mentioned period.
3. "Two political parties were bitterly divided": This suggests that despite the appearance of unity, there were significant disagreements and conflicts between political parties during the Era of Good Feelings.
To evaluate the statement, we need to verify whether these components align with historical facts. During the Era of Good Feelings, there was indeed a period of overall economic prosperity; however, the claim that "two political parties were bitterly divided" is false. In reality, this era was characterized by a decline in political party conflict, as the Federalist Party, the main opposition to the Democratic-Republican Party, had effectively dissolved.
Therefore, the correct answer to the question is: False. The Era of Good Feelings was not a period of sustained economic prosperity, and the two political parties were not bitterly divided during that time.