Say during the civil war the southhad the same amount of people as the north. Would they south win??
Probably not. The South didn't have the industries, the money, or the moral imperative to win the Civil War.
During the American Civil War, the determining reason the North won was superior industrial capacity. In a long war, especially a war of attrition (look that word up), industrial strength will favor the winner.
Now in a Short WAr, industrial strength wouldn't matter as much, and one can speculate forever on that. AT the beginning, the South had several advantages: They had spirit, good military leaders, and loyal soldiers.
Other factors beside population base and industrial strength is sea trade (meaning a Navy to protect ports), and the stamina of the civil population to standfast in the wake of hardship.
I hope this helps.
Even if the South had the same population as the North during the American Civil War, it is still unlikely that they would have won. This is because the North had superior industrial capacity, more developed infrastructure, and greater financial resources compared to the South. Furthermore, the North had a more powerful navy that allowed them to establish trade relationships and maintain access to valuable resources.
While the South had some advantages, such as high morale, capable military leaders, and committed soldiers, these factors alone would not be enough to overcome the North's significant economic and technological advantages. In a long war, especially one of attrition, having strong industrial capabilities is crucial for sustaining one's military and population, and the North had a clear advantage in this regard.
Additionally, the South's reliance on slavery as a key element of their economy and social structure put them at a moral disadvantage, with many nations refusing to support their cause. This further weakened their position and made it more difficult for them to secure the resources and aid they needed to compete with the North.
In summary, even if the South had an equal population during the Civil War, it is unlikely that they would have been able to defeat the North due to their inferior industrial capacity, infrastructure, financial resources, and other factors. The North's overall advantages in these areas allowed them to ultimately emerge as the victors in this conflict.
In a hypothetical scenario where the South had the same amount of people as the North during the Civil War, it is still unlikely that the South would have won. The North had several advantages, such as superior industrial capacity, more money, and a stronger moral imperative to fight. Industrial strength played a crucial role in the outcome of the war, as it allowed the North to produce more weapons, ammunition, and supplies. Additionally, the North had a stronger navy to protect its ports and maintain sea trade. The South did have some initial advantages, including spirit, good military leaders, and loyal soldiers, but these factors alone would not have been enough to overcome the North's advantages in the long run. Ultimately, the North's industrial strength and other advantages would have likely tipped the scales in their favor, even if the population numbers were equal.
To determine the outcome of a hypothetical scenario where the South had the same population as the North during the Civil War, we need to consider several factors:
1. Industrial Capacity: The North had a significant advantage in terms of industrial capacity. They had more factories, resources, and infrastructure to produce weapons, ammunition, and supplies for their troops. This industrial strength would have given the North a significant advantage in a prolonged war.
2. Economic Resources: The North had greater financial resources than the South. They had a more developed banking system, greater access to capital, and a larger tax base. This allowed them to fund their war efforts more effectively and sustain a long-term conflict.
3. Naval Power: The Union had a stronger navy, which would have made it difficult for the South to maintain trade routes, blockade southern ports, and receive essential supplies from foreign countries.
4. Moral Imperative and International Support: The North had a stronger moral imperative as they fought to preserve the Union and end slavery, which garnered international sympathy and support. The South, on the other hand, fought to protect their rights to own slaves, which was a less favorable cause internationally.
5. Leadership: While the South had several skilled military leaders, including generals like Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson, the North also had notable leaders like Ulysses S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman. The North's leadership was generally more cohesive and effective in executing military strategies.
Considering these factors, it is unlikely that the South would have won the Civil War even if they had the same population as the North. The North's advantages in industrial capacity, economic resources, naval power, and international support would have likely tipped the balance in their favor.