12.)"If representation in Congress is to be determined by the number of people who live in each state, should slaves be counted?"

At the Constitutional Convention, how would someone from a Southern state most likely respond?

A.)Yes, they live in our state, and they should be counted.

B.)Yes, they are equal to white people and should be counted.

C.)No, slaves were not born in the states and should not be counted.

D.)No, slaves are not equal to white people and should not be counted.

Your Mom is right. The Southern states wanted the highest population possible so they'd have more representatives in Congress.

My mom says A But i think C Who's correct?

At the Constitutional Convention, someone from a Southern state would most likely respond to the question of whether slaves should be counted for representation in Congress by choosing option A) "Yes, they live in our state, and they should be counted."

To understand why a person from a Southern state would support counting slaves for representation, it's important to have some background knowledge about the context of the question. During the Constitutional Convention, there was a significant divide between Northern and Southern states regarding the issue of slavery.

Southern states heavily relied on the labor of enslaved individuals, and their economies were deeply tied to the institution of slavery. As a result, Southern states sought to maximize their representation in Congress, as representation determined political power and influence. Therefore, counting their enslaved population would increase their representation in Congress, as more people in their state meant more seats in the House of Representatives.

It's worth noting that this was a highly controversial issue, and not all individuals from Southern states held the same views. However, based on the historical context, it is most likely that someone from a Southern state would support counting slaves for representation in Congress.