This is from my question I posted earlier:

What is the corruption Ronald Reagan is hiding in his Berlin Wall speech? What is the bad thing he's hiding?

After reading the speech, I can only conclude that Reagan want to rally the people of West Berlin to oppose communism. I can't seem to find/understand the deeper meaning of what he's trying to hide.

Is it because Reagan wants to hide the criticism he got for violating the INF Treaty?

I have never read the speech in its entirety, so I can't really help you. He did not, as I recall, talk about the Iran-Contra affair at all, so by not speaking of it and his own hypocrisy, not to mention illegal deals, you may be right.

On the other hand, why would he have talked about the Iran-Contra affair at a speech about the Berlin Wall?

There are many different ways to look at all this, Joes. You must consider all angles and see what YOU THINK!

Exactly, writeacher. The IMF treaty was also not the subject of the speech. It was about the Berlin wall and the "Iron Curtain".

To understand what Ronald Reagan might be hiding in his Berlin Wall speech, it is important to first analyze the context and purpose of the speech itself.

The Berlin Wall speech, delivered by Reagan on June 12, 1987, was a significant moment during the Cold War. Reagan spoke at Brandenburg Gate, a site near the Berlin Wall, with the intention of challenging the policies and existence of the wall itself, as well as advocating for human rights and freedom.

It is crucial to note that, based on the content of the speech, there is no explicit indication that Reagan was addressing any specific corruption he might have been involved in. The speech primarily focuses on the ideological differences between communism and democracy, and Reagan's motivation to encourage the people of West Berlin to resist the oppressive nature of communist regimes.

Therefore, it is unlikely that Reagan was hiding any corruption in his Berlin Wall speech. It is essential to approach claims or accusations of corruption with proper evidence and historical context to avoid perpetuating misinformation or misunderstanding.

In regards to your suggestion of Reagan hiding criticism related to violating the INF (Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces) Treaty, it is worth mentioning that this treaty was not part of the focus of Reagan's Berlin Wall speech. The INF Treaty was signed between the United States and the Soviet Union in 1987, around the same time as the speech, to eliminate intermediate-range nuclear missiles. While violations of treaties are distinct issues, there is no direct connection between Reagan's speech and the INF Treaty.

To gain further insights into Reagan's Berlin Wall speech, it is advisable to study the speech transcripts, historical records, and analyses from credible sources. This approach helps to form a more comprehensive understanding of the context, goals, and potential implications of the speech.