the trouble with television Robert MacNeil voices a strong opinion about television in a paragraph explain his opinion then tell whether you agree or disagree with him support your view with at least two pieces of evidence from MacNeil's essay or from your own reading or experience.
His opinion, is he feels like television is a waste of time. He feels like there are many things people can do besides laying around watching tv all the time.
But what is the evidence to support that claim?
Do you agree with MacNeil?
Why?
Can I do tv is bad? idk anymore
Robert MacNeil voices a strong opinion about television in his essay "The Trouble with Television." He expresses his concern over how television has become a dominant force in shaping people's lives, negatively impacting various aspects of society. MacNeil argues that television has contributed to the decline of reading, as the easily consumable medium often replaces the longer and more intellectually stimulating act of reading. Additionally, he highlights how television's focus on entertainment and infotainment has shifted public discussions away from serious issues, leading to a decrease in the overall depth and quality of conversations.
Personally, I agree with MacNeil's opinion that television has its drawbacks. Firstly, his argument regarding the decline of reading resonates with me. With the advent of television, more people have turned to the passive act of watching rather than actively engaging with written material. I have personally noticed a decrease in the time my peers spend reading books or articles, opting for quick and shallow snippets of information from television or online sources instead.
Additionally, MacNeil's observation about the impact of television on public discourse is supported by my own experiences. Television networks often prioritize sensationalism and entertainment value over in-depth analysis. As a result, important topics are oversimplified or sensationalized, leading to a shallow understanding and limited meaningful dialogue. This can be seen in news broadcasts that prioritize sensational stories or political debates that focus more on soundbites and personal attacks rather than substantive discussions.
In conclusion, I agree with Robert MacNeil's stance on the negative impact of television. The decline of reading and the shallowness of public discourse are two evident consequences of television's influence. By prioritizing active engagement with written material and seeking out more in-depth discussions, we can mitigate the adverse effects of television and foster a more intellectually stimulating society.