what are examples of distributive, retributive, and communative justice?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributive_justice

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retributive_justice

http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/commutative-justice.html

x - x2 + 2x - 4 =8x -24 - x2

Distributive justice, retributive justice, and commutative justice are three different principles of justice that are often discussed in ethical and legal contexts. Here are examples to help you understand each concept:

1. Distributive Justice:

Distributive justice refers to the fair distribution of resources, opportunities, and benefits in society. It focuses on how goods and burdens should be allocated among individuals and groups.

Example: In a society practicing distributive justice, a progressive taxation system could be implemented where higher-income individuals are taxed more to fund social welfare programs that benefit lower-income individuals. This ensures a more equitable distribution of wealth and promotes social equality.

2. Retributive Justice:

Retributive justice revolves around the idea of punishment for wrongdoing. It is concerned with the consequences an individual should face for their actions, aiming to maintain social order and prevent further harm.

Example: If someone commits a crime, retributive justice would suggest that they should face a punishment proportionate to the offense committed. For example, if someone steals, they may be sentenced to a period of imprisonment as a consequence for their actions.

3. Commutative Justice:

Commutative justice, also known as corrective justice, focuses on the fairness and equality of exchanges or transactions between individuals or parties. It is concerned with ensuring that agreements are upheld and that people are treated fairly in their interactions.

Example: In a business context, commutative justice would suggest that if two parties enter into a contract, both should fulfill their obligations. If one party fails to deliver the agreed-upon services, commutative justice would require compensation or some form of remedy to restore fairness in the transaction.

Please note that these examples provide a general understanding of each concept and may vary depending on cultural, legal, and philosophical perspectives.