PHOENIX, Sept. 20, 2012- Arizona's new immigration law takes effect this week. According to the law, police officers must check the status of anyone who may be an undocumented immigrant. Officers have the right to decide who is checked under this law.
A lawyer challenging this law would look up cases involving which right or freedom?
-freedom from unreasonable searches**
-freedom of the press
-right to a fair trial
-right to petition the government
Jonah's Blog
The stop online piracy act (SOPA) is wrong! It makes everyone responsible for illegal actions by just a few people. Online companies have to police the sites that people visit, and that means that regular people may not be able to visit the websites that they want to see. Everyone on the internet should oppose SOPA.
Which constitutional issue is addressed in this blog post?
-Freedom of unreasonable searches
-Freedom to petition the government
-Freedom of religion
-Freedom of speech**
I agree with both of your answers.
okay, thank you.
You're welcome.
To determine which right or freedom a lawyer challenging the Arizona immigration law would look up cases involving, we need to analyze the case. The law states that police officers must check the status of anyone who may be an undocumented immigrant, and officers have the right to decide who is checked under this law.
Given this information, a lawyer challenging this law would most likely look up cases involving the "freedom from unreasonable searches." This is because the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of individuals based on their own judgment and without any specific probable cause. This can be seen as a violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Now let's move on to the second question regarding Jonah's Blog and the issue addressed in the blog post. The blog post discusses the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and highlights concerns about everyone being held responsible for illegal actions by a few people and the impact on regular people's internet access.
The constitutional issue addressed in this blog post is the "freedom of speech." This is because the blog post expresses an opinion about the SOPA legislation and calls for opposition to it. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the freedom of speech, which protects individuals' rights to express their opinions and ideas, even if they are critical of government actions or policies.
In summary:
- A lawyer challenging the Arizona immigration law would look up cases involving the "freedom from unreasonable searches."
- The constitutional issue addressed in Jonah's Blog post is the "freedom of speech."