How two main constitutional compromises dealt with the various sectional differences between the states ?
http://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entry.php?rec=733
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=3&psid=163
IDEKMS
The two main constitutional compromises that dealt with sectional differences between the states were the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise.
1. The Great Compromise:
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, resolved the conflict between small and large states regarding representation in the legislative branch.
Process to get the answer:
To understand how the Great Compromise dealt with sectional differences, you can follow these steps:
Step 1: Research the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
Step 2: Examine the debate over representation in the legislative branch.
Step 3: Explore the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan, which were the competing proposals during the convention.
Step 4: Compare and contrast the two plans to understand the sectional differences they addressed.
Step 5: Analyze the compromise proposed by Roger Sherman of Connecticut.
Step 6: Consider how the final plan balanced the interests of small and large states in terms of representation in Congress.
By understanding these steps, you will be able to explain how the Great Compromise dealt with sectional differences between the states.
2. The Three-Fifths Compromise:
The Three-Fifths Compromise addressed the issue of counting enslaved individuals for the purpose of both representation and taxation.
Process to get the answer:
To understand how the Three-Fifths Compromise dealt with sectional differences between the states, you can follow these steps:
Step 1: Research the issue of slavery during the Constitutional Convention.
Step 2: Explore the debate over whether enslaved individuals should be counted towards representation.
Step 3: Understand the Southern states' desire to count the enslaved population, which would increase their representation in Congress.
Step 4: Examine the Northern states' opposition to counting enslaved individuals, as they were denied basic rights.
Step 5: Analyze the compromise reached, where enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person for both representation and taxation purposes.
Step 6: Consider the impact of this compromise on the sectional differences between the states.
By following these steps, you will be able to explain how the Three-Fifths Compromise addressed the sectional differences between the states.