PLEASE HELP ME I REALLY NEED HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
10. Why did the Regulators form in the Up Country and not in the Low Country? (1 point)
a. The Low Country had sheriffs and established courts to deal with outlaws.
b. The Up Country did not trust the sheriffs and courts established by the Low Country.
c. The Up Country lacked transportation to the courts, so the Regulators were a convenience.
d. The Low Country did not have as many outlaws as the Up Country and did not need the Regulators.
What does your text say about life in the Low Country and the Up Country? What did the Regulators do?
I cannot find it anywhere in my book that is why I am asking you to point me in the right direction.
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1445397098
To answer this question, we need to analyze the options provided:
a. The option states that the Low Country had sheriffs and established courts to deal with outlaws. This implies that there was already a system in place to handle law enforcement in the Low Country, which may have rendered the formation of the Regulators unnecessary.
b. The option suggests that the Up Country did not trust the sheriffs and courts established by the Low Country. This distrust could have been a motivating factor for the formation of the Regulators in the Up Country.
c. The option claims that the Up Country lacked transportation to the courts, and therefore the Regulators served as a convenient alternative. While transportation may have been a hindrance, it does not necessarily explain why the Regulators formed specifically in the Up Country and not the Low Country.
d. The option reasons that the Low Country did not have as many outlaws as the Up Country and, as a result, did not require the formation of the Regulators. This suggests that the presence of a higher number of outlaws in the Up Country may have been a factor in the formation of the Regulators in that region.
Considering the options provided, option b, "The Up Country did not trust the sheriffs and courts established by the Low Country," seems to be the most relevant and plausible explanation for why the Regulators formed in the Up Country and not in the Low Country. The lack of trust in the existing law enforcement system could have led the residents of the Up Country to form the Regulators as an alternative means of maintaining order and seeking justice.
Keep in mind that this answer is based on the information provided. To obtain more comprehensive and accurate information about the topic, it's recommended to study historical sources or references that pertain to the formation of the Regulators in the Up Country.