John Quinn does not explain the rule about the paddle to Paul, the narrator of “The Pigman & Me.” How does this one action affect the rest of the essay?
It affects the rest of the story because now John wants to fight Paul but he didn't know he was supposed to give it to him
In order to answer this question, it's important to read and analyze the essay "The Pigman & Me" by Paul Zindel. However, since you're referring to a specific event in the essay where John Quinn doesn't explain the rule about the paddle to Paul, we can still discuss the potential impact of this action.
Without knowing the specific details and context of the essay, we can make some educated assumptions. One possible way this action could affect the rest of the essay is by creating a sense of tension or conflict between John Quinn and Paul. If John Quinn intentionally withholds information about the paddle rule, it may lead to misunderstandings, frustrations, or even conflicts between the two characters.
This action might also highlight the theme of miscommunication or lack of trust within the narrative. It might emphasize the difficulties of navigating relationships, particularly between friends or acquaintances who may not always be open or honest with each other.
Another possibility is that this action could serve as a catalyst for character development or growth in Paul. If he discovers the unexplained paddle rule and faces the consequences, it might prompt him to reflect on his own behavior, learn from his mistakes, or reevaluate his relationship with John Quinn.
To fully understand the impact of this action on the rest of the essay, it is necessary to read the complete text and carefully consider the narrative's progression, themes, and character development.