Please check my rewrites (the ones with a black dot/bullet).

Thank you!

a. The importance of your family.

Thesis: The success of a child depends on the support of his or her family.

* I think this is debatable because the other side could argue that the success of a child depends on different factors such as determination and work ethic instead of family support alone.
It seems debatable, but it's weak. How many people would really disagree with this statement, do you think? Huge numbers? Very few?? If "very few," then it needs to be strengthened.

***** I agree with you. The thesis is weak because I could not even come up with a strong argument when I try to write about this.

•Rewrite : Different from friends, family members are more frank and this candid attitude helps a person improve.

------------------------

b. The difficulty of adjusting to college.

Thesis: Despite the difficulty associated with being far away from home, college students will develop important life skills.

* I think this is not specific enough (that is, how will the important life skills influence the college students?).

Rewrite:
Despite the difficulty associated with being far away from home, college students will develop important life skills that aid them in their future careers.
Your rewrite is better, but can you make it even stronger?
• Third Re-write:
Through their difficult times in college, students will be armored with essential life skills that allow them to cope with other plights.

------------------------
c. Air pollution

Thesis: Because of the growing air pollution, the government should impose laws and regulation on factories.

*This could be debatable in that the opposing side could argue that the government should have the citizens take action (examples: carpooling ,biking,public transportation,smoking restrictions,etc) instead of the the factories,since the industries are essential to consumers.
Good --- how will you revise this one?

• Rewrite (I changed my stance here.)
While both the factories and the people's daily activities contribute to air pollution, it is chiefly the people's role,not the factories, to help reduce air pollution.

a. The importance of your family.

Thesis: The success of a child depends on the support of his or her family.

The thesis you provided is weak because it can be debated whether family support alone is the sole determinant of a child's success. To strengthen your thesis, you could consider the following points:

1. Research evidence: Find studies or research that support the idea that family support plays a significant role in a child's success. Cite specific examples or statistics to back up your claim.

2. Counterarguments: Address potential counterarguments, such as the importance of determination and work ethic, and explain why family support is still crucial in a child's success. Provide reasoning or evidence to support your rebuttal.

3. Emotional appeal: Emphasize the emotional support, guidance, and stability that family can provide, which can positively impact a child's motivation, mental well-being, and overall success. Use personal anecdotes or relatable examples to make your argument stronger.

Your revised statement, "Different from friends, family members are more frank, and this candid attitude helps a person improve," introduces a new perspective but lacks a clear connection to the importance of family in a child's success. Consider revising it to specifically address the factors that make family support crucial for a child's success.

b. The difficulty of adjusting to college.

Thesis: Despite the difficulty associated with being far away from home, college students will develop important life skills.

Your thesis can be strengthened by providing more specific information about the important life skills that college students will develop and how these skills will benefit them in their future careers. Consider the following suggestions:

1. Identify specific life skills: List the specific life skills, such as time management, critical thinking, problem-solving, or independence, that college students are likely to develop through the challenges they face while being far away from home.

2. Connect to future benefits: Explain how these life skills will be useful in their future careers or personal lives. Highlight examples or potential scenarios where these skills will be applicable and advantageous.

Your revised statement, "Through their difficult times in college, students will be armed with essential life skills that allow them to cope with other plights," is an improvement, but it can be further strengthened by elaborating on the specific life skills that college students will gain and how these skills will help them overcome challenges in other areas of life.

c. Air pollution

Thesis: Because of the growing air pollution, the government should impose laws and regulations on factories.

Your thesis is debatable, as the opposing side could argue that it is the responsibility of citizens to take action to reduce air pollution, such as carpooling, biking, using public transportation, or following smoking restrictions, rather than solely relying on regulations imposed on factories. To revise your thesis, consider the following:

1. Acknowledge both factors: Recognize that both factories and individuals contribute to air pollution. Highlight the significance of each party's role in addressing the issue.

2. Balance of responsibility: Explain why individuals should take responsibility for their actions and how behavior changes can collectively make a significant impact on air pollution. Provide evidence or examples of successful citizen-driven efforts in reducing pollution.

3. Government regulations: Argue for the importance of government regulations targeting factories and other industrial sources of pollution. Elaborate on the role these regulations can play in reducing emissions and holding polluting industries accountable.

Your revised statement, "While both the factories and people's daily activities contribute to air pollution, it is chiefly the people's role, not the factories, to help reduce air pollution," presents a different stance but lacks a clear explanation of how individuals can actively participate in reducing air pollution. Develop your argument further by providing specific actions that individuals can take and how their collective efforts can make a difference.