A correlatibas .82 was found betweenen number of hours studied and final exam scores. A.students who stuief less received a high exam scores. B.students who studied who studied received lower exam scores. C.studying caused studies to received higher exam scores. D.The amount of studying was unrelated to exam scores. I am think c
Assuming I parsed the garbled English correctly, I agree that C was the correct choice.
You really gotta work on your typing.
Piaget stated the children's theories about the world? A.remain the same until adulthood. B. Undergo three major changes during development c.are never test by the children. D.are based on adults tell them. I am think b. If parent believe that children are tabula rasa at birth, they are likely to ? A.leave their children alone so their virtutous natures can unfold. B.be very permissive with their children. C.assume that nothing they will do will influence on their children development. I am think c
Thanks Steve the first question is a correlation
I figure out the rest of the questions
To determine which statement is supported by the given information, you need to understand the concept of correlation and causation.
A correlation coefficient (in this case, 0.82) measures the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables (in this case, the number of hours studied and final exam scores). It does not imply causation, meaning it does not prove that one variable directly causes the other to change.
Based on the given information, the correct answer is not C ("studying caused students to receive higher exam scores") because correlation does not imply causation. The fact that there is a strong correlation between the number of hours studied and final exam scores does not prove that studying caused the higher scores.
Therefore, the most appropriate answer would be A ("students who studied less received higher exam scores"). This indicates that there is an inverse relationship between the two variables in this case.