Artistic efforts were slow to develop in colonies for the following reasons except:
a. there was no strong esthetic tradition there
b. american colonists lacked artistic ability
c. wealth and leisure was slow to develip and as it did religion and ploitics received priority
d. colonists lacked the money to strongly support the arts
e. training had to be completed in england
I think it is either b or e
I agree with Dana.
B and E can't possibly be right. Do you really think that just because English people came to America that they somehow lost their artistic talents?
sorry i read the question wrong
To determine the correct answer, let's examine each option:
a. There was no strong aesthetic tradition there: This could be a reason why artistic efforts were slow to develop in colonies. The absence of a well-established artistic tradition might have hindered the growth of artistic endeavors.
b. American colonists lacked artistic ability: This option suggests that the lack of artistic talent among American colonists prevented the development of artistic efforts. However, it is important to note that artistic ability can be cultivated and developed over time, so this might not be the main reason.
c. Wealth and leisure were slow to develop, and as they did, religion and politics received priority: This option highlights the fact that other aspects, such as religion and politics, took precedence over artistic endeavors. The limited availability of resources and the emphasis on religious and political matters could have diverted attention and resources away from the arts.
d. Colonists lacked the money to strongly support the arts: This option suggests that the lack of financial resources among the colonists hindered the strong support for artistic endeavors.
e. Training had to be completed in England: This option implies that the training required for artists had to be completed in England, which might have created a barrier to the development of artistic efforts in the colonies.
Considering these options, it becomes apparent that option b (American colonists lacked artistic ability) does not seem to be a plausible reason for the slow development of artistic efforts in colonies. Historically, artistic abilities can be found in all societies, so it is unlikely that the lack of talent alone was responsible for the slow growth of the arts.
The correct answer is therefore e (training had to be completed in England). The dependence on England for artistic training could have limited the opportunities for aspiring artists in the colonies, as they would have had to travel abroad to receive formal artistic education. This logistical constraint could have impeded the development of artistic efforts in the colonies.