How does the episode with Victor's father and the episode with the lightning strike as described in this excerpt function similarly? (5 points)


They both involve the reading of books about science.
They both involve interactions with parents or guardians.
They both suggest a certain powerlessness in the narrator.
They both suggest people who directly influenced the narrator.

It sound like the third option is the only way to go on this.

(lighting episode)
And thus for a time I was occupied by exploded systems, mingling, like an unadept, a thousand contradictory theories and floundering desperately in a very slough of multifarious knowledge, guided by an ardent imagination and childish reasoning, till an accident again changed the current of my ideas. When I was about fifteen years old we had retired to our house near Belrive, when we witnessed a most violent and terrible thunderstorm. It advanced from behind the mountains of Jura, and the thunder burst at once with frightful loudness from various quarters of the heavens. I remained, while the storm lasted, watching its progress with curiosity and delight. As I stood at the door, on a sudden I beheld a stream of fire issue from an old and beautiful oak which stood about twenty yards from our house; and so soon as the dazzling light vanished, the oak had disappeared, and nothing remained but a blasted stump. When we visited it the next morning, we found the tree shattered in a singular manner. It was not splintered by the shock, but entirely reduced to thin ribbons of wood. I never beheld anything so utterly destroyed.

(father episode)
I feel exquisite pleasure in dwelling on the recollections of childhood, before misfortune had tainted my mind and changed its bright visions of extensive usefulness into gloomy and narrow reflections upon self. Natural philosophy is the genius that has regulated my fate; I desire, therefore, in this narration, to state those facts which led to my predilection for that science. When I was thirteen years of age we all went on a party of pleasure to the baths near Thonon; the inclemency of the weather obliged us to remain a day confined to the inn. In this house I chanced to find a volume of the works of Cornelius Agrippa. I opened it with apathy; the theory which he attempts to demonstrate and the wonderful facts which he relates soon changed this feeling into enthusiasm. A new light seemed to dawn upon my mind, and bounding with joy, I communicated my discovery to my father. My father looked carelessly at the title page of my book and said, "Ah! Cornelius Agrippa! My dear Victor, do not waste your time upon this; it is sad trash."

The episode with Victor's father and the episode with the lightning strike function similarly in the following ways:

1. They both involve the reading of books about science. In the lightning strike episode, the narrator mentions being occupied by "exploded systems" and "floundering desperately in a very slough of multifarious knowledge." In the father episode, the narrator discovers a volume of the works of Cornelius Agrippa, which sparks his interest in natural philosophy.

2. They both involve interactions with parents or guardians. In the lightning strike episode, the narrator witnesses the thunderstorm with their family, and later visits the tree with their family. In the father episode, the narrator excitedly communicates their discovery to their father, who dismisses it as "sad trash."

3. They both suggest a certain powerlessness in the narrator. In the lightning strike episode, the narrator watches the storm "with curiosity and delight" but is ultimately powerless to prevent the destruction of the oak tree. In the father episode, the narrator's enthusiasm for the book is met with indifference and dismissal by their father.

4. They both suggest people who directly influenced the narrator. In the lightning strike episode, the narrator witnesses the powerful force of nature, which could be seen as a direct influence on their understanding of the world. In the father episode, the narrator's discovery of Agrippa's book and their excitement to share it with their father shows the influence their father has on their interests and pursuits.

Overall, these two episodes share similarities in terms of the involvement of science books, interactions with parents, a sense of powerlessness, and the influence of people on the narrator's development.

In order to determine how the episode with Victor's father and the episode with the lightning strike function similarly, we need to analyze the given points one by one.

1. They both involve the reading of books about science.
- The excerpt mentions that in the lightning strike episode, the narrator (Victor) was occupied by exploded systems and contradictory theories, indicating an interest in scientific knowledge. In the father episode, Victor discovers a volume of the works of Cornelius Agrippa, which sparks his enthusiasm for science. Both episodes involve the protagonist's encounter with scientific literature.

2. They both involve interactions with parents or guardians.
- In the lightning strike episode, the narrator witnesses the lightning strike together with their family, specifically mentioning "we." This indicates an interaction with family members. In the father episode, the narrator communicates their discovery to their father, indicating an interaction with their father. Both episodes involve the narrator's interaction with their parents or guardians.

3. They both suggest a certain powerlessness in the narrator.
- The lightning strike episode describes the narrator's curiosity and delight in observing the storm, but they are ultimately powerless to prevent the destruction caused by the lightning strike. In the father episode, the narrator's father dismisses their interest in Cornelius Agrippa's works, indicating a lack of control or influence over their own intellectual pursuits. Both episodes suggest a sense of powerlessness in the narrator.

4. They both suggest people who directly influenced the narrator.
- In the lightning strike episode, there is no direct mention of someone who influenced the narrator. However, in the father episode, the narrator's father plays a direct role in shaping their interest in science by dismissing the book and referring to it as "sad trash." This directly influences the narrator's perception and enthusiasm for scientific knowledge, albeit in a negative way. Both episodes suggest a person who directly influenced the narrator.

Based on the analysis, it is clear that the episodes with Victor's father and the lightning strike function similarly in terms of involving interactions with parents or guardians and suggesting a certain powerlessness in the narrator. These similarities contribute to the development of the protagonist's character and their relationship with scientific knowledge.