What are some example of prejudical rhetorical device and nonprejudical devices.
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1150484982
Prejudicial use of rhetorical devices would be when someone uses language that causes you to draw erroneous conclusions and will often have little ground to stand on, or use faulty evidence such as gross generalizations, stereotyping by using preconceived judgments or ideas.
"do you still beat your step children?" (Infers you beat your step children, although this may be completely untrue)
Non-prejudicial rhetoric is when someone merely states simple facts, which are already in evidence.
what is prejudical rhectorial device
sorry this was amistake
Prejudicial rhetorical devices are those that appeal to emotions, biases, or stereotypes, often used to sway the audience's opinion through manipulation rather than objective reasoning. On the other hand, non-prejudicial devices are those that emphasize logical reasoning, evidence-based arguments, and appeals to reason. Here are examples of both types:
Prejudicial Rhetorical Devices:
1. Ad hominem: Attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing their points.
Example: "You can't trust that politician; they come from a wealthy background, so they must be out of touch with the average citizen."
2. Stereotyping: Using broad generalizations about a group to draw conclusions about individuals within that group.
Example: "All millennials are lazy and entitled; they expect everything to be handed to them."
3. Fearmongering: Exploiting fear and creating a sense of panic to gain support for a particular position.
Example: "If we don't pass this law, our country will be flooded with dangerous criminals and terrorists."
Non-prejudicial Rhetorical Devices:
1. Logical reasoning: Presenting a line of reasoning with clear premises and conclusions based on evidence.
Example: "If we invest in renewable energy, we will reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and mitigate climate change."
2. Analogies: Drawing comparisons between different situations to help explain a complex idea.
Example: "Taking away healthcare coverage without a replacement plan is like removing a safety net from a tightrope walker."
3. Statistical data: Using reliable and relevant data to support arguments and provide evidence.
Example: "Studies have shown that countries with stricter gun control laws have lower rates of gun-related deaths."
When assessing the rhetoric of a persuasive message, it's crucial to identify whether the devices used are prejudicial or non-prejudicial to evaluate the strength of the argument and understand any potential biases being presented.