What was the "corrupt bargain" of the 1824 election?
Split of the Democratic-Republican candidates
Description by Andrew Jackson of the election outcome
Smear campaign John Quincy Adams used to win****
Difference between the popular and electoral votes
Nope.
http://www.ushistory.org/us/23d.asp
Huh?
It was that Henry Clay convinced the house to elect Adams (the electoral vote had no winner).
Then Adams made Clay his sec off state.
yea i agree with damon
The "corrupt bargain" refers to a historical event that took place during the 1824 United States presidential election. In this election, none of the four candidates received an absolute majority of electoral votes. The candidates were Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, and William H. Crawford.
To understand the "corrupt bargain" of the 1824 election, it is important to know the background. During this time, the Democratic-Republican Party was the dominant political party, which splintered into factions. Andrew Jackson was the candidate favored by the Democratic-Republican Party supporters. However, due to the split among party supporters, no candidate received the necessary majority in the Electoral College.
As a result, the election was sent to the House of Representatives, as per the Constitution's provisions. According to these provisions, the House would select the president from the top three candidates if no candidate received an electoral majority.
In this situation, Henry Clay, who finished fourth in the electoral vote, was disqualified from being considered for the presidency. Despite this, Clay held significant influence in Congress, and he used this position to help John Quincy Adams secure the presidency. Clay believed that Adams' presidency would allow him to advance his interests, as Adams was seen as more amenable to Clay's policy proposals.
After the election, Adams appointed Clay as his Secretary of State, commonly viewed as a stepping stone to the presidency at that time. Jackson and his supporters were outraged, perceiving the alliance between Clay and Adams as a "corrupt bargain." They believed that Adams had effectively bought Clay's support in the House by offering him an influential position in return.
It's important to note that there is some debate about whether the "corrupt bargain" was truly corrupt or just political maneuvering. Nevertheless, the term has become synonymous with the controversy surrounding the 1824 election and the perception of an unfair alliance between Adams and Clay.