The War Powers Resolution is possibly unconstitutional because:
A.Encroaches upon executive authority.
B.All are correct.
C.It is a legislative right.
D.Was not properly enacted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution#Questions_regarding_constitutionality
What do you think?
To determine which option is correct, let's break down the question and logically analyze each answer choice:
A. Encroaches upon executive authority:
The War Powers Resolution is a federal law that imposes certain limitations on the President's ability to deploy U.S. armed forces without congressional approval. This law was enacted by Congress to check the executive branch's power in making decisions for military action. Therefore, it can be argued that the War Powers Resolution does encroach upon executive authority to an extent.
B. All are correct:
If this option were selected, it would mean that all of the other answer choices (A, C, and D) are correct. Since option A already acknowledges that the War Powers Resolution encroaches upon executive authority, and option D is about the law being improperly enacted, selecting option B would be redundant. So, it is unlikely that this option is the correct answer.
C. It is a legislative right:
This option is incorrect because the War Powers Resolution is not a legislative right. Instead, it is a law passed by Congress that controls and regulates the executive branch's power regarding the use of military force. It is not a right but rather a limitation on the executive branch.
D. Was not properly enacted:
This option could be a valid concern in the context of constitutional issues. If the War Powers Resolution was not enacted according to the constitutional procedures for passing a law, then it could potentially be deemed unconstitutional. However, without further context or specific evidence to support this claim, it is difficult to ascertain the accuracy of this option.
Considering the analysis above, the most accurate answer choice would be option A: "Encroaches upon executive authority." This option acknowledges the inherent tension between the War Powers Resolution and executive authority, which can raise constitutional concerns.