Casey said that 40 people were surveyed. Is his answer reasonable? Explain
I can't answer that without knowing the rest of the facts.
Dkdoaksldalska
Casey said that 40 people with severe is his answer reasonable explain
To determine whether Casey's answer is reasonable, we need to consider the context and use our judgment. In this case, Casey claimed that 40 people were surveyed.
There are a few ways to assess the reasonableness of this answer:
1. Knowledge of the survey's purpose: Depending on the purpose of the survey, the sample size of 40 people could be too small or sufficient. For instance, if the survey aims to understand national trends, a sample of 40 people would likely be insufficient. However, if the survey focuses on a small community or a niche topic, 40 people might be considered reasonable.
2. Scale of the population: If the survey pertains to a population with millions of individuals, such as a nationwide survey, 40 people would be too small to draw accurate generalizations. However, if the survey is targeted at a relatively small population, such as a local neighborhood or a specific group, the sample size might be more reasonable.
3. Statistical significance: To ensure statistical reliability, surveys often require a certain minimum sample size. The sample size needed depends on various factors, such as the desired confidence level and margin of error. If the survey aims to achieve high statistical validity, 40 respondents might be insufficient.
Ultimately, without further context or information about the survey's objectives, it is difficult to definitively determine whether Casey's answer of surveying 40 people is reasonable. It may be necessary to consider additional factors such as the survey method, target population, and purpose to make an informed judgment. Additionally, consulting with experts in survey methodology or examining established guidelines for sample sizes can help assess reasonableness.