The case of Schenck v. United States established that (Points : 1)
free speech is an absolute and unlimited civil liberty.
speech may be abridged when an individual finds it offensive.
speech may be abridged when it creates a clear and present danger.
nothing can be considered dangerous speech during time of war.
speech may be abridged when it creates a clear and present danger.
Right.
The correct answer is: speech may be abridged when it creates a clear and present danger.
To find the answer, you can follow these steps:
1. Start by researching the case of Schenck v. United States. This is a landmark Supreme Court case that took place in 1919.
2. Read and understand the context of the case. The case involved Charles Schenck, who was charged with violating the Espionage Act by distributing anti-draft pamphlets during World War I.
3. Analyze the Supreme Court's ruling in the case. In its decision, the Court established the "clear and present danger" test, which allows speech to be restricted or abridged if it presents a clear and present danger to public safety.
4. Review the available answer options and choose the one that aligns with the Court's ruling. In this case, the correct answer is "speech may be abridged when it creates a clear and present danger."