Pluralistic and Elitist Matrix

Create a matrix between the pluralistic and elitist perspective. When differentiating between the two perspectives, provide examples of each perspective. Identify instances of who might fill these roles.

Example: Super PACs (political action committees) from an elitist perspectiveSuper PACs are political committees organized for the purpose of raising and spending money to elect or defeat candidates. Usually, the PACs represent business, labor, or special interest groups. In summary, PACs can give $5,000 to a candidate committee per election and may also give up to $15,000 annually to any national party committee.

Definitely not health!!

And definitely ... no one here will do the assignment for you, "alwayslearning." Someone here might be able to critique your thinking and writing once you give it a try, though.

Your first step must be to understand, thoroughly, what "pluralistic" and "elitist" mean in the context of politics. Once you understand those words and how they are applied, you have a good start.

Courtesy of bobpursley who found this link:

http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/theory/alternative_theories.html

Pluralistic Perspective | Elitist Perspective

----------------------|---------------------
In the pluralistic perspective, power is believed to be distributed among various groups and individuals in society. This perspective suggests that different groups possess different types of power and can influence decision-making processes. | The elitist perspective, on the other hand, asserts that power is concentrated in the hands of a small, select group of individuals or organizations who possess wealth, social status, or political influence.
Example: Labor Unions | Example: Billionaires
Labor unions represent an example of the pluralistic perspective, as they advocate for the rights and interests of workers. Labor unions bring together individuals who share common goals and collectively bargain with employers on matters such as wages, working conditions, and benefits. By organizing and mobilizing their members, labor unions have the potential to influence policies and decision-making processes that affect workers. | Billionaires and wealthy individuals often symbolize the elitist perspective. These individuals have significant financial resources and can use their wealth to influence politics, public opinion, and policy decisions. For example, billionaires may donate large sums of money to political campaigns or establish their own organizations to advocate for specific policies that align with their interests.
Example: Grassroots Activism | Example: Lobbyists
Grassroots activism is another example of the pluralistic perspective. Grassroots movements typically emerge from the bottom-up, driven by ordinary individuals who come together to promote a specific cause or agenda. These movements often rely on popular support, community organizing, and grassroots mobilization to push for social, political, or environmental change. | Lobbyists exemplify the elitist perspective as they are hired by special interest groups or corporations to influence policymakers and advocate for specific policies or legislation. Lobbyists often possess extensive knowledge of the political system and connections with influential individuals, allowing them to effectively navigate the halls of power and shape policy outcomes.
Example: Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) | Example: Corporate CEOs
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) represent pluralistic perspectives as they are often formed by groups of individuals with shared values and goals, unrelated to government or profit-seeking motives. NGOs operate independently from the government and focus on addressing various social, environmental, or humanitarian issues. They rely on grassroots support, donations, and partnerships to advance their missions and effect change. | Corporate CEOs, particularly those who lead large multinational corporations, exemplify the elitist perspective. These individuals possess significant economic power and often influence policy decisions through their economic influence and access to policymakers. Corporate CEOs also have the ability to shape public opinion and impact society through their company's actions and policies.

It is important to note that these examples are not exhaustive and perspectives on pluralism and elitism can vary in different contexts. Additionally, individuals and organizations may not strictly fit into one perspective or the other, as power dynamics are often complex and multifaceted.