Schattschneider’s “mobilization of bias” is characterized by all except: (Points : 1)

Mobilization will always lead to violence.
The two sides to a conflict include actors and spectators.
One side seeks to localize the conflict.
One side seeks to socialize the conflict.

Mobilization will always lead to violence.

Yup. You're correct.

To determine which option is incorrect, we need to understand the concept of Schattschneider's "mobilization of bias." According to Schattschneider, the mobilization of bias refers to how power structures and political resources shape conflicts, influence participation, and determine the outcomes of political struggles.

Option 1: "Mobilization will always lead to violence." This statement is not a characteristic of Schattschneider's mobilization of bias. Mobilization can lead to a range of outcomes, including violence, but it is not an inherent feature of the concept.

Option 2: "The two sides to a conflict include actors and spectators." This statement is a characteristic of Schattschneider's mobilization of bias, as he argues that conflicts involve both active participants (actors) and those who observe or have a stake in the outcome (spectators).

Option 3: "One side seeks to localize the conflict." This statement is a characteristic of Schattschneider's mobilization of bias. He highlights how one side may try to limit the scope and reach of a conflict, often to avoid challenging existing power structures.

Option 4: "One side seeks to socialize the conflict." This statement is a characteristic of Schattschneider's mobilization of bias. He contends that one side may attempt to expand the conflict and bring attention to the underlying issues to encourage broader societal engagement.

Based on this analysis, the incorrect statement is "Mobilization will always lead to violence" (Option 1).