An appellate court that hears an appeal on a money laundering case from a district court....(Points : 1)

A) is not concerned with guilt or innocence.
B) can only send the case back for retrial.
C) is concerned with whether proper legal procedures were followed during the district court trial.
D) determines the constitutionality of the law.

1)When the Supreme Court hands down a decision, it is (Points : 1)

A) often a mixed decision with majority, dissenting, and even concurring opinions.
B) always a unanimous 9-0 decision. C) a law forever and can never be overturned.
D) always free of politics.

2)The reason why the Supreme Court came around to upholding that states had an obligation to provide attorneys to those who could not afford them was (Points : 1)
A)attorneys were charging additional costs to poor defendants.
B) to provide a fair advantage to defendants.
C) it was something that other countries did.
D) to encourage defendants to plea bargain.

http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1428949726#1428949726.1428950335

C) is concerned with whether proper legal procedures were followed during the district court trial.

To determine the correct answer, we need to consider the role of an appellate court and the specific context of the appeal on a money laundering case from a district court.

An appellate court is a higher court that reviews decisions made by lower courts. Its role is not primarily concerned with determining guilt or innocence but rather with reviewing the legal procedures and decisions made in the lower court. In the case of a money laundering appeal, the appellate court will consider whether proper legal procedures were followed during the original district court trial. This includes examining issues such as the admissibility of evidence, the conduct of the trial, and whether the appropriate legal standards were applied.

Therefore, the correct answer is C) is concerned with whether proper legal procedures were followed during the district court trial.