Consider the following primal LP problem.

Max 𝑍=2π‘₯1+5π‘₯2+7π‘₯3 s.t. π‘₯1+2π‘₯2=6,and π‘₯1β‰₯0, π‘₯2β‰₯0,π‘₯3β‰₯0.
(a) Graph the feasible region. [4]
(b) Find the gradient of the objective function, and then find the projected gradient onto the feasible region. [6]
(c) Starting from the initial trial solution (π‘₯1,π‘₯2, π‘₯3)=(1,1,1), perform two iterations of the interior-point algorithm. [20]

(a) To graph the feasible region, we need to plot the constraints π‘₯1+2π‘₯2=6, π‘₯1β‰₯0, π‘₯2β‰₯0, and π‘₯3β‰₯0.

First, let's solve the equation π‘₯1+2π‘₯2=6 for π‘₯2:

π‘₯1 + 2π‘₯2 = 6
2π‘₯2 = 6 - π‘₯1
π‘₯2 = (6 - π‘₯1)/2

Now we can draw the graph.

For π‘₯1 = 0, π‘₯2 = (6 - 0)/2 = 3.
For π‘₯2 = 0, π‘₯1 = 6 - 0 = 6.

So we have the points (0, 3), (6, 0), and the origin (0, 0).

Finally, we draw a line passing through these points.

```
|
| /
| /
| /
| /
|/
------------------
0 3 6
```

(b) The gradient of the objective function is the vector of coefficients of the decision variables, which is (2, 5, 7).

To find the projected gradient onto the feasible region, we need to calculate the normal vector to the feasible region's boundary at the current trial solution (π‘₯1,π‘₯2)=(1,1).

From the constraint π‘₯1+2π‘₯2=6, we can rewrite it as π‘₯2=(6-π‘₯1)/2. Taking the derivative of π‘₯2 with respect to π‘₯1, we get 𝑑π‘₯2/𝑑π‘₯1= -1/2.

Therefore, the normal vector to the feasible region's boundary is (1, -1/2).

(c) To perform two iterations of the interior-point algorithm, we need to update the trial solution based on the Newton direction and update the barrier parameter (ΞΌ).

Step 1: Initialize the trial solution and barrier parameter.
π‘₯1 = 1, π‘₯2 = 1, π‘₯3 = 1, ΞΌ = 1

Iteration 1:
Step 2: Calculate the gradient and Hessian matrix.
The gradient of the objective function is (2, 5, 7).

𝐻essian matrix:
[0 0 0]
[0 0 0]
[0 0 0]

Step 3: Calculate the Newton direction.
Direction = -𝐻essian^-1 * gradient = (0, 0, 0)

Step 4: Determine the step size (Ξ±).
Since the direction is zero, Ξ± is calculated as infinity.

Step 5: Update the trial solution.
π‘₯1 = π‘₯1 + Ξ± * Direction = 1 + ∞ * 0 = 1
π‘₯2 = π‘₯2 + Ξ± * Direction = 1 + ∞ * 0 = 1
π‘₯3 = π‘₯3 + Ξ± * Direction = 1 + ∞ * 0 = 1

Step 6: Update the barrier parameter.
ΞΌ = ΞΌ/10 = 1/10 = 0.1

Iteration 2:
Step 2: Calculate the gradient and Hessian matrix.
The gradient of the objective function is (2, 5, 7).

𝐻essian matrix:
[0 0 0]
[0 0 0]
[0 0 0]

Step 3: Calculate the Newton direction.
Direction = -𝐻essian^-1 * gradient = (0, 0, 0)

Step 4: Determine the step size (Ξ±).
Since the direction is zero, Ξ± is calculated as infinity.

Step 5: Update the trial solution.
π‘₯1 = π‘₯1 + Ξ± * Direction = 1 + ∞ * 0 = 1
π‘₯2 = π‘₯2 + Ξ± * Direction = 1 + ∞ * 0 = 1
π‘₯3 = π‘₯3 + Ξ± * Direction = 1 + ∞ * 0 = 1

Step 6: Update the barrier parameter.
ΞΌ = ΞΌ/10 = 0.1/10 = 0.01

After two iterations of the interior-point algorithm, the trial solution remains unchanged at (π‘₯1,π‘₯2,π‘₯3)=(1,1,1), and the barrier parameter ΞΌ is updated to 0.01.

(a) To graph the feasible region, we need to plot the constraints of the linear programming problem.

The first constraint is π‘₯1 + 2π‘₯2 = 6. We can rewrite this equation in terms of π‘₯1:
π‘₯1 = 6 - 2π‘₯2

Next, we plot the region where π‘₯1 β‰₯ 0, π‘₯2 β‰₯ 0, and π‘₯3 β‰₯ 0. Since π‘₯3 is not present in any constraint, it can take any non-negative value. Therefore, we don't need to plot it on the graph.

To graph the feasible region, we can use a coordinate system with π‘₯1 on the x-axis and π‘₯2 on the y-axis.

1. Start by plotting the line π‘₯1 + 2π‘₯2 = 6. To do this, find two points that satisfy the equation. For example, when π‘₯2 = 0, π‘₯1 = 6, and when π‘₯2 = 3, π‘₯1 = 0. Plot these two points and draw a straight line connecting them.

2. Next, shade the region below the line since π‘₯1 + 2π‘₯2 is less than or equal to 6.

3. Finally, shade the region to the right of the y-axis since π‘₯1 is greater than or equal to 0.

The shaded region represents the feasible region for this linear programming problem.

(b) To find the gradient of the objective function, we will take the partial derivatives with respect to π‘₯1, π‘₯2, and π‘₯3.

βˆ‡π‘ = (βˆ‚π‘/βˆ‚π‘₯1, βˆ‚π‘/βˆ‚π‘₯2, βˆ‚π‘/βˆ‚π‘₯3)
= (2, 5, 7)

The projected gradient onto the feasible region is the projection of βˆ‡π‘ onto the tangent space of the feasible region at the current point.

(c) To perform two iterations of the interior-point algorithm starting from the initial trial solution (π‘₯1, π‘₯2, π‘₯3) = (1, 1, 1), we'll update the trial solution and iterate twice using the interior-point algorithm.

Iteration 1:
1. Compute the Newton step, which is the solution to the linear system (βˆ‡Β²π‘ + 𝑍𝑅)𝑆 = -βˆ‡π‘, where βˆ‡Β²π‘ is the Hessian matrix of second partial derivatives and 𝑅 is a diagonal matrix with 𝑅_𝑖𝑖 = π‘₯_𝑖/𝑠_𝑖.

2. Update the trial solution using the Newton step: (π‘₯1, π‘₯2, π‘₯3) = (π‘₯1, π‘₯2, π‘₯3) + 𝑆.

3. Go to step 1 until convergence.

Repeat the above steps for Iteration 2.