Why did some people want representation to be based on population?
Each person's vote should count the same.
Some people wanted representation to be based on population for a few reasons. One of the main reasons is that they believed it would provide a more accurate reflection of the will of the people. By having representation based on population, areas with larger populations would have more representatives, ensuring that their voices and interests are adequately represented in the government. This approach ensures that majority views prevail and helps prevent minority groups from holding disproportionate power.
To explore this further, you can study the historical context of the demand for representation based on population. One key event that influenced this idea was the American Revolution, where colonists fought for the principle of "no taxation without representation." They argued that since they were being taxed, they should have a say in the laws and policies being imposed on them. As a result, when it came time to establish a new government, many believed that representation based on population would be a fair and just system.
Furthermore, you can look into the debates and discussions during the drafting of constitutions or other governing documents in different countries. These discussions often revolve around the question of how to ensure fair representation, with some advocating for equal representation for all regions, regardless of population, while others argue for a system based on population.
Researching historical documents, such as the Federalist Papers, or studying the debates during constitutional conventions can provide insights into the reasoning behind the demand for representation based on population. Additionally, examining the experiences of different countries and their electoral systems can shed light on the advantages and disadvantages of this approach.