Which answer best describes an important outcome of the Gibbons v. Ogden court case?
The case set definitions for navigation and placed state control over all coastal and river trade.
The case set definitions for navigation and placed federal control over all coastal and river trade.
The case set the precedent for Congress to override a federal law when it conflicts with a state law.
The case set the precedent for Congress to override a state law when it conflicts with a federal law.
Is it d
ms sue pls help me. someone help me
Ms. sue i think you are kind of rude
Lol, I have this question five years later.
I would like to know because the link is not working.
...the link doesnt work
how are we sapposed to know the answer if the link doesnt even work
someone pls help me
is it c.. reed or ms sue
Yes, the correct answer is d: "The case set the precedent for Congress to override a state law when it conflicts with a federal law."
To arrive at this answer, it is important to have an understanding of the Gibbons v. Ogden court case. The case, which took place in 1824, involved a dispute between two steamboat operators, Aaron Ogden and Thomas Gibbons, over the rights to operate steamboats in New York waters.
To find the answer:
1. Research the Gibbons v. Ogden court case: Look for credible sources such as historical texts, legal databases, or reputable educational websites. Learn about the details of the case, including the arguments made by both sides, the legal implications, and the final ruling.
2. Analyze the outcome of the court case: Pay close attention to how the court ruled and what precedent was set. Consider the impact that the ruling had on federal versus state powers, and the relationship between federal and state laws.
3. Evaluate the answer choices: Compare the answer choices provided and select the option that aligns with the outcome of the Gibbons v. Ogden court case.
4. Confirm the correct answer: Double-check your answer to ensure it accurately reflects the precedent set by the court case.
In this case, option d is the correct answer as it accurately describes the precedent established by the court case, which allowed Congress to override state laws conflicting with federal laws.