A forensic psychologist is often hired by the defense or the prosecutor to look at jury selection. What would this psychologist be looking for during voir dire and in his or her investigations of the jury pool? Why would the items being investigated be important to the defense (or prosecution)?
Check this site.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/voir+dire
Please note, we do not do your homework for you.
Check this site; also be sure to check the links attached.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_psychology
IT seems to me one should be looking for things that affect the defense theory of the crime.
what is quantitative
A forensic psychologist hired to evaluate jury selection is typically interested in understanding the characteristics and biases of potential jurors during the voir dire process. Here's what they might look for and why it's relevant to both the defense and prosecution:
1. Demographics: The psychologist may examine demographic factors, such as age, race, gender, and occupation, in order to identify potential biases or prejudices. This information can help the defense or prosecution assess how the jury composition aligns with the client's interests, and whether it could potentially impact the fairness of the trial.
2. Attitudes and beliefs: Evaluating the attitudes and beliefs of potential jurors is crucial for assessing how they might interpret and evaluate evidence. The psychologist may look for indications of potential biases, such as preconceived notions about the defendant, the crime, or related social issues. This information can help the defense or prosecution predict how jurors might be inclined to view the case and tailor their strategies accordingly.
3. Personal experiences: Investigating the personal experiences of potential jurors can provide insights into their potential biases or sympathies. For example, if the case involves a violent crime, a juror who has personally experienced violence may have an emotional reaction that could influence their judgment. Understanding such experiences can help the defense or prosecution identify jurors whose biases may favor or disfavor their case.
4. Social identification: The psychologist may assess how potential jurors identify themselves within various social groups, such as political affiliation, religious beliefs, or community involvement. This information is relevant because individuals often hold biases or affiliations that can impact their perception of the case. Identifying potential group affiliations can help the defense or prosecution identify jurors who may be more or less sympathetic to their arguments.
5. Decision-making style: Evaluating the decision-making approaches of potential jurors is important as it can predict how they will analyze the evidence and reach a verdict. The psychologist may investigate whether jurors tend to be more analytical or emotional in their decision-making, which can provide insights into their potential biases and reasoning processes.
By examining these factors, a forensic psychologist can help the defense or prosecution make informed decisions about which jurors to select and whether to raise any concerns about potential biases and fairness during the jury selection process. Understanding the characteristics and potential biases of the jury pool can help ensure a more fair and impartial trial for the defendant.